Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bernstein polynomial
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Elementary proof === The probabilistic proof can also be rephrased in an elementary way, using the underlying probabilistic ideas but proceeding by direct verification:<ref>{{harvnb|Lorentz|1953|pages=5β6}}</ref><ref name="Beals 2004"/><ref>{{harvnb|Goldberg|1964}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Akhiezer|1956}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Burkill|1959}}</ref> The following identities can be verified: # <math> \sum_k {n \choose k} x^k (1-x)^{n-k} = 1</math> ("probability") # <math> \sum_k {k\over n} {n \choose k} x^k (1-x)^{n-k} = x</math> ("mean") # <math> \sum_k \left( x -{k\over n}\right)^2 {n \choose k} x^k (1-x)^{n-k} = {x(1-x)\over n}. </math> ("variance") In fact, by the binomial theorem <math display="block">(1+t)^n = \sum_k {n \choose k} t^k,</math> and this equation can be applied twice to <math>t\frac{d}{dt}</math>. The identities (1), (2), and (3) follow easily using the substitution <math>t = x/ (1 - x)</math>. Within these three identities, use the above basis polynomial notation :<math> b_{k,n}(x) = {n\choose k} x^k (1-x)^{n-k},</math> and let :<math> f_n(x) = \sum_k f(k/n)\, b_{k,n}(x).</math> Thus, by identity (1) :<math>f_n(x) - f(x) = \sum_k [f(k/n) - f(x)] \,b_{k,n}(x), </math> so that :<math>|f_n(x) - f(x)| \le \sum_k |f(k/n) - f(x)| \, b_{k,n}(x).</math> Since ''f'' is uniformly continuous, given <math>\varepsilon > 0</math>, there is a <math>\delta > 0</math> such that <math>|f(a) - f(b)| < \varepsilon</math> whenever <math>|a-b| < \delta</math>. Moreover, by continuity, <math>M= \sup |f| < \infty</math>. But then :<math> |f_n(x) - f(x)| \le \sum_{|x -{k\over n}|< \delta} |f(k/n) - f(x)|\, b_{k,n}(x) + \sum_{|x -{k\over n}|\ge \delta} |f(k/n) - f(x)|\, b_{k,n}(x) .</math> The first sum is less than Ξ΅. On the other hand, by identity (3) above, and since <math>|x - k/n| \ge \delta</math>, the second sum is bounded by <math>2M</math> times :<math>\sum_{|x - k/n|\ge \delta} b_{k,n}(x) \le \sum_k \delta^{-2} \left(x -{k\over n}\right)^2 b_{k,n}(x) = \delta^{-2} {x(1-x)\over n} < {1\over4} \delta^{-2} n^{-1}.</math> :([[Chebyshev's inequality]]) It follows that the polynomials ''f''<sub>''n''</sub> tend to ''f'' uniformly.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)