Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Forcing (mathematics)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Consistency == The discussion above can be summarized by the fundamental consistency result that, given a forcing poset <math> \mathbb{P} </math>, we may assume the existence of a generic filter <math> G </math>, not belonging to the universe <math> V </math>, such that <math> V[G] </math> is again a set-theoretic universe that models <math> \mathsf{ZFC} </math>. Furthermore, all truths in <math> V[G] </math> may be reduced to truths in <math> V </math> involving the forcing relation. Both styles, adjoining <math> G </math> to either a countable transitive model <math> M </math> or the whole universe <math> V </math>, are commonly used. Less commonly seen is the approach using the "internal" definition of forcing, in which no mention of set or class models is made. This was Cohen's original method, and in one elaboration, it becomes the method of Boolean-valued analysis.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)