Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
IBM Personal Computer AT
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== By January 1985, AT sales were so strong that IBM and its suppliers could not keep up with demand.<ref name="sanger19850118">{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/1985/01/18/business/computer-giant-finds-problems-in-success.html?pagewanted=all | title=Computer Giant Finds Problems in Success | access-date=February 25, 2011 | author=Sanger, David E. | date=January 18, 1985 | work=The New York Times}}</ref> An estimated 350,000 were sold by the end of 1985.{{r|bright19860623}} ''[[Creative Computing]]'' in December 1984 said "the folks at IBM have done it again". It approved of the "refreshingly standard" keyboard layout, but said that "for most individuals, AT power represents overkill ... a state of the art machine at a top of the line price".<ref name="lockwood198412">{{Cite magazine |last=Lockwood |first=Russ |date=December 1984 |title=IBM PC AT; state of the art technology enhances the PC. |url=https://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v10n12/32_IBM_PC_AT_state_of_the_a.php |access-date=2025-01-31 |magazine=Creative Computing |page=32}}</ref> That month the magazine's [[David H. Ahl]] chose the AT as the best desktop computer when "price is no object" for 1984, describing it as "an innovative, state-of-the-art computer that has the competition gasping for breath".<ref name="ahl198412">{{Cite magazine |last=Ahl |first=David H. |author-link=David H. Ahl |date=December 1984 |title=Top 12 computers of 1984 |url=https://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v10n12/10_Top_12_computers_of_1984.php |magazine=Creative Computing |access-date=March 16, 2019}}</ref> An industry analyst wrote in ''[[Computerworld]]'' in 1985 that the AT's power was evidence of IBM's belief that personal computers were more important for the company than minicomputers.<ref name="jeffery19850930">{{cite news | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MmR2XHzI9yoC&pg=RA1-PA46 | title=IBM's high-end micros encroaching on mini territory | work=Computerworld | date=September 30, 1985 | access-date=January 2, 2015 | author=Jeffery, Brian | pages=SR/20β21}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)