Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Integral fast reactor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Advantages== [[Breeder reactor]]s (such as the IFR) could in principle extract almost all of the energy contained in [[uranium]] or [[thorium]], decreasing fuel requirements by nearly two orders of magnitude compared to traditional once-through reactors, which extract less than 0.65% of the energy in mined uranium, and less than 5% of the enriched uranium with which they are fueled. This could greatly dampen concern about fuel supply or energy used in [[uranium mining|mining]]. What is more important today is ''why'' fast reactors are fuel-efficient: because fast neutrons can [[nuclear fission|fission]] or "burn out" all the [[transuranic waste]] components. Transuranic waste consists of [[actinides]] – [[reactor-grade plutonium]] and [[minor actinides]] – many of which last tens of thousands of years or longer and make conventional nuclear waste disposal so problematic. Most of the radioactive [[fission product]]s produced by an IFR have much shorter [[Half-life|half-lives]]: they are intensely radioactive in the short term but decay quickly. Through many cycles, the IFR ultimately causes 99.9% of the uranium and [[transuranium element]]s to undergo fission and produce power; so, its only waste is the [[nuclear fission product]]s. These have much shorter half-lives; in 300 years, their radioactivity will fall below that of the original uranium ore.<ref name="SV/g chart">[https://web.archive.org/web/20140519002715/http://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/Global/Publikationer/Tidskrift/Nucleus/2007/Nucleus-4-2007.pdf Nucleus-4-2007] pg 15 see SV/g chart, ''www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se''</ref><ref name=berkeley/>{{Unreliable source?|date=July 2012}}<ref name="https">{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuunX3Oc4n4 |title=Roger Blomquist of ANL (Argonne National Lab) on IFR (Integral Fast Reactor) @ TEAC6 . Stated at ~ 13 minutes |website=[[YouTube]] |date=12 July 2014 }}</ref>{{better source|date=July 2014}} The fact that [[Generation IV reactor|4th generation reactor]]s are being designed to use the waste from [[Generation III reactor|3rd generation plant]]s could change the nuclear story fundamentally—potentially making the combination of 3rd and 4th generation plants a more attractive energy option than 3rd generation by itself would have been, both from the perspective of waste management and energy security. "Integral" refers to on-site [[Nuclear reprocessing|reprocessing]] by electrochemical [[pyroprocessing]]. This process separates spent fuel into 3 fractions: uranium, plutonium [[isotope]]s and other [[transuranium element]]s, and nuclear fission products. The uranium and transuranium elements are recycled into new [[Nuclear fuel|fuel rods]], and the fission products are eventually converted to glass and metal blocks for safer disposal. Because the combined transuranium elements and the fission products are highly radioactive, fuel-rod transfer and reprocessing operations use robotic or remote-controlled equipment. An additional claimed benefit of this is that since fissile material never leaves the facility (and would be lethal to handle if it did), this greatly reduces the [[Nuclear proliferation|proliferation]] potential of possible diversion of fissile material.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)