Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Interactive proof system
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== PCP === {{main|Probabilistically checkable proof}} While the designers of '''IP''' considered generalizations of Babai's interactive proof systems, others considered restrictions. A very useful interactive proof system is '''PCP'''(''f''(''n''), ''g''(''n'')), which is a restriction of '''MA''' where Arthur can only use ''f''(''n'') random bits and can only examine ''g''(''n'') bits of the proof certificate sent by Merlin (essentially using [[random access]]). There are a number of easy-to-prove results about various '''PCP''' classes. {{tmath|1=\mathsf{PCP}(0,\mathsf{poly})}}, the class of polynomial-time machines with no randomness but access to a certificate, is just '''NP'''. {{tmath|1=\mathsf{PCP}(\mathsf{poly},0)}}, the class of polynomial-time machines with access to polynomially many random bits is '''co-[[RP (complexity)|RP]]'''. Arora and Safra's first major result was that {{tmath|1= \mathsf{PCP}(\log, \log) = \mathsf{NP} }}; put another way, if the verifier in the '''NP''' protocol is constrained to choose only {{tmath|O(\log n)}} bits of the proof certificate to look at, this won't make any difference as long as it has {{tmath|O(\log n)}} random bits to use.<ref>Sanjeev Arora and [[Shmuel Safra]]. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/arora92probabilistic.html Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP]. ''Journal of the ACM'', volume 45, issue 1, pp. 70β122. January 1998.</ref> Furthermore, the [[PCP theorem]] asserts that the number of proof accesses can be brought all the way down to a constant. That is, {{tmath|1=\mathsf{NP} = \mathsf{PCP}(\log, O(1))}}.<ref>Sanjeev Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/376426.html Proof Verification and the Hardness of Approximation Problems]. Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 13β22. 1992.</ref> They used this valuable characterization of '''NP''' to prove that [[approximation algorithm]]s do not exist for the optimization versions of certain [[NP-complete]] problems unless [[P = NP]]. Such problems are now studied in the field known as [[hardness of approximation]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)