Editing Keith Windschuttle (section)

==2009 ''Quadrant'' hoax==
In January 2009, Windschuttle was hoaxed into publishing an article in ''Quadrant''. The stated aim of the hoax was to expose Windschuttle's purported right-wing bias by proving he would publish an inaccurate article and not check its footnotes or authenticity if it met his preconceptions. An author using the pseudonym "biotechnologist Dr Sharon Gould" submitted an article claiming that [[Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation|CSIRO]] had planned to produce food crops engineered with human genes. However, "Gould" revealed that she had regarded the article as an [[Alan Sokal]]-style hoax, referring to an instance in which writings described as obvious scientific nonsense were submitted to and accepted by an academic journal.<ref>Graham Young, [http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8387&page=0 "The Windschuttle Hoax – Replete with Irony,"] ''Online Opinion'', 12 January 2009.</ref> Based on the reporter's intimate knowledge of the hoax and what he described as her "triumphant" tone when disclosing the hoax to him, Windschuttle accused the online publication ''[[Crikey]]'' of being involved in the hoax, a claim ''Crikey'' denied.<ref>Keith Windschuttle, [http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/qed/2009/01/margaret-simons-and-an-apparent-hoax-on-quadrant "Margaret Simons and an Apparent Hoax on Quadrant,"] ''Quadrant'', 6 January 2009.</ref><ref>Margaret Simons, [https://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/06/how-windschuttle-swallowed-a-hoax-to-publish-a-fake-story-in-quadrant/ "How Windschuttle Swallowed a Hoax to Publish a Fake Story in Quadrant,"] ''Crikey'', 6 January 2009.</ref> Two days later, Crikey revealed that "Gould" was in fact the writer, editor and activist Katherine Wilson. Wilson agreed to being named by ''Crikey'', as her name had already appeared in online speculation and it seemed likely that her identity was about to be revealed by other journalists.<ref>Margaret Simons, [https://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/08/outing-sharon-gould-the-hoaxers-identity-revealed/ "Outing 'Sharon Gould': the Hoaxer's Identity Revealed,"] ''Crikey'', 8 January 2009</ref>

Reporters Kelly Burke and Julie Robotham note that "the projects cited by 'Gould' as having been dumped by the organisation [CSIRO] are not in themselves implausible, and similar technologies are in active development. Human vaccines against diseases including hepatitis B, respiratory syncytial virus and Norwalk virus have been genetically engineered into crops as diverse as lettuce, potato and corn, and shown to provoke an immune response in humans." Gould also suggests the CSIRO abandoned research into the creation of dairy cattle capable of producing non-allergenic milk for lactose-intolerant infants and a genetically engineered mosquito that could stimulate antibodies against malaria in humans who were bitten, mitigating against ''[sic]'' the spread of the disease. Both ideas are under serious scientific study by research groups around the world.<ref>Kelly Burke and Julie Robotham, [https://www.smh.com.au/news/national/plausible-inventions-lie-alongside-the-facts/2009/01/06/1231004021057.html "Plausible Inventions Lie Alongside the Facts,"] ''The Sydney Morning Herald'', 7 January 2009.</ref>

The hoax elements of the article published in ''Quadrant'' were that the CSIRO had planned such research, that they had abandoned it because of perceived public moral or ethical objections and that evidence of this was "buried" in footnotes to an article in a scientific journal and in two annual reports of the CSIRO, the relevant report years being unspecified. Windschuttle stated: "A real hoax, like that of Alan Sokal and [[Ern Malley]], is designed to expose editors who are pretentious, ignorant or at least over-enthusiastic about certain subjects. The technique is to submit obvious nonsense for publication in order to expose the editor's ignorance of the topic. A real hoax defeats its purpose if it largely relies upon real issues, real people and real publications for its content. All of the latter is true of what "Sharon Gould" wrote. Indeed, the overwhelming majority of the content of her article is both factually true and well-based on the sources she cites."<ref>Keith Windschuttle, [http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/qed/2009/01/this-hoax-a-dud-cheque "QED: This Hoax a Dud Cheque"], ''Quadrant Online'', 7 January 2009</ref>