Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
M-theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Relationships between string theories=== Although there were only a handful of consistent superstring theories, it remained a mystery why there was not just one consistent formulation.<ref name="Duff 1998, p. 65"/> However, as physicists began to examine string theory more closely, they realized that these theories are related in intricate and nontrivial ways.<ref>Duff 1998</ref> In the late 1970s, Claus Montonen and [[David Olive]] had conjectured a special property of certain physical theories.<ref>Montonen and Olive 1977</ref> A sharpened version of their conjecture concerns a theory called [[N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory|{{math|''N'' {{=}} 4}} supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory]], which describes theoretical particles formally similar to the [[quark]]s and [[gluon]]s that make up [[atomic nucleus|atomic nuclei]]. The strength with which the particles of this theory interact is measured by a number called the [[coupling constant]]. The result of Montonen and Olive, now known as [[Montonen–Olive duality]], states that {{math|''N'' {{=}} 4}} supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory with coupling constant {{math|''g''}} is equivalent to the same theory with coupling constant {{math|1/''g''}}. In other words, a system of strongly interacting particles (large coupling constant) has an equivalent description as a system of weakly interacting particles (small coupling constant) and vice versa<ref name="Duff 1998, p. 66">Duff 1998, p. 66</ref> by spin-moment. In the 1990s, several theorists generalized Montonen–Olive duality to the S-duality relationship, which connects different string theories. [[Ashoke Sen]] studied S-duality in the context of heterotic strings in four dimensions.<ref>Sen 1994a</ref><ref>Sen 1994b</ref> [[Chris Hull]] and [[Paul Townsend]] showed that type IIB string theory with a large coupling constant is equivalent via S-duality to the same theory with small coupling constant.<ref>Hull and Townsend 1995</ref> Theorists also found that different string theories may be related by T-duality. This duality implies that strings propagating on completely different spacetime geometries may be physically equivalent.<ref name="Duff 1998, p. 67">Duff 1998, p. 67</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)