Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Promiscuity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Other animals== {{Further|Animal sexual behaviour|Extra-pair copulation}} Some researchers have suggested that the practice of referring to animals as promiscuous in reference to their mating system is often inaccurate and potentially biased. More precise terms such as [[Polyandry in animals|polyandry]], [[Polygyny in animals|polygyny]], and [[polygynandry]] are increasingly preferred.<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1186/1742-9994-10-66| issn = 1742-9994| volume = 10| issue = 1| pages = 66| last1 = Elgar| first1 = Mark A.| last2 = Jones| first2 = Therésa M.| last3 = McNamara| first3 = Kathryn B.| title = Promiscuous words| journal = Frontiers in Zoology| date = 2013-11-08| doi-access = free| pmid = 24209457| pmc = 3828398}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1093/icb/icae138| issn = 1540-7063| volume = 64| issue = 6| pages = 1717–1733| last1 = Baker| first1 = Zoe| last2 = Hayssen| first2 = Virginia| title = A Practical Guide to Avoiding Biased Communication in Reproductive Biology| journal = Integrative and Comparative Biology| access-date = 2025-01-02| date = 2024-12-01| pmid = 39138061| pmc = 11659675| url = https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icae138}}</ref> Many animal species, such as [[spotted hyena]]s,<ref name="courtship">{{cite journal | last1 = Szykman | first1 = M. | last2 = Van Horn | first2 = R. C. | last3 = Engh | first3 = A.L. | last4 = Boydston | first4 = E. E. | last5 = Holekamp |first5=K. E. | year = 2007 | title = Courtship and mating in free-living spotted hyenas | url = http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/Dominance/Papers/SzykmanetalHyenaMatingBehaviour2007.pdf | journal = Behaviour | volume = 144 | issue = 7 | pages = 815–846 | doi = 10.1163/156853907781476418 | bibcode = 2007Behav.144..815S | citeseerx = 10.1.1.630.5755 | access-date = 24 December 2011 | archive-date = 30 November 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121130193631/http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/Dominance/Papers/SzykmanetalHyenaMatingBehaviour2007.pdf | url-status = dead }}</ref> [[Pig|pigs]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Birkhead |first=Tim |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3i4Q8SvohfEC&pg=PA103 |title=Promiscuity: An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition |date=2000 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-00666-9 |language=en}}</ref> [[bonobo]]s<ref>{{cite journal|title=Bonobo Sex and Society |last=de Waal |first=Frans B. M. |author-link=Frans de Waal |journal=[[Scientific American]] |date=March 1995 |volume=272 |issue=3 |pages=58–64 |url=http://www.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/uploads/media/Bonobo_sex_01.pdf |access-date=21 December 2011 |bibcode=1995SciAm.272c..82W |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0395-82 |pmid=7871411 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120127051545/http://www.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/uploads/media/Bonobo_sex_01.pdf |archive-date=27 January 2012 }}</ref> and [[Common chimpanzee|chimpanzee]]s, are promiscuous as a rule, and do not form [[pair bond]]s. Although social monogamy occurs in about 90% of avian species and about 3% of [[mammal]]ian species, an estimated 90% of socially monogamous species exhibit individual promiscuity in the form of [[extra-pair copulations|copulation outside the pair bond]].<ref name="Barash Lipton 2001">{{cite book |last1=Lipton |first1=Judith Eve |last2=Barash |first2=David P. |title=The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People |publisher=W.H. Freeman and Company |location=San Francisco |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-7167-4004-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780716740049 }}</ref><ref name="Reichard 2002">{{cite journal|last1=Reichard |first1=U.H. |title=Monogamy—A variable relationship |journal=Max Planck Research |volume=3 |pages=62–7 |year=2002 |url=http://www.mpg.de/1028786/W001_Biology-Medicine_062_067.pdf |access-date=24 April 2013 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110311080753/http://www.mpg.de/1028786/W001_Biology-Medicine_062_067.pdf |archive-date=March 11, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="Gowaty Morell 1998">Research conducted by [[Patricia Adair Gowaty]]. Reported by {{cite journal |last1=Morell |first1=V. |year=1998 |title=Evolution of sex: A new look at monogamy |journal=Science |volume=281 |pages=1982–1983 |issue=5385 |doi=10.1126/science.281.5385.1982 |pmid=9767050|s2cid=31391458 }}</ref> In the animal world, some species, including birds such as [[swan]]s and fish such as ''[[Neolamprologus pulcher]]'', once believed [[Monogamy in animals|monogamous]], are now known to engage in [[extra-pair copulation]]s. One example of extra-pair fertilization (EPF) in birds is the [[black-throated blue warbler]]s. Though it is a socially monogamous species, both males and females engage in EPF.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chuang |first1=H.C. |last2=Webster |first2=M.S. |last3=Holmes |first3=R.T. |title=Extrapair Paternity and Local Synchrony in the Black-Throated Blue Warbler |journal=The Auk |year=1999 |volume=116 |series=3 |pages=726–736 |doi=10.2307/4089333 |issue=3|jstor=4089333 }}</ref> The Darwin-Bateman paradigm, which states that males are typically eager to copulate while females are more choosy about whom to mate with, has been confirmed by a [[meta-analysis]].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom|first1=Tim|last1=Janicke|first2=Ines K.|last2=Häderer|first3=Marc J.|last3=Lajeunesse|first4=Nils|last4=Anthes|date=1 February 2016|journal=Science Advances|volume=2|issue=2|pages=e1500983|doi=10.1126/sciadv.1500983|pmid=26933680|pmc=4758741|bibcode=2016SciA....2E0983J}}</ref> There is, however, continued debate about the utility and pitfalls of the Bateman perspective.<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.010| issn = 0003-3472| volume = 168| pages = –5–e9| last = Hoquet| first = Thierry| title = Bateman's principles: why biology needs history and philosophy| journal = Animal Behaviour| access-date = 2025-01-02| date = 2020-10-01| url = https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347220302438}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.008| issn = 0003-3472| volume = 164| pages = 223–231| last = Hoquet| first = Thierry| title = Bateman (1948): rise and fall of a paradigm?| journal = Animal Behaviour| access-date = 2025-01-02| date = 2020-06-01| url = https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347219303975}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.04.020| issn = 0003-3472| volume = 168| pages = –1–e4| last = Morimoto| first = Juliano| title = Bateman (1948): was it all wrong? A comment on Hoquet (2020)| journal = Animal Behaviour| access-date = 2025-01-02| date = 2020-10-01| url = https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347220301214| url-access = subscription}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)