Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Prostitution in Nevada
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Public opinion == The opinions of Nevada residents vary, but the majority appears to support the status quo of prostitution: they support laws allowing licensed brothels in the rural areas, but oppose the legalization of prostitution in Las Vegas. A poll conducted in Nevada in 2002<ref>Hagar, Ray., [http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html/2002/09/15/23806.php "Poll: Just over half oppose outlawing brothels"], ''[[Reno Gazette-Journal]]'', 2002-09-15, Retrieved on July 24, 2007.</ref> found that 52% of the 600 respondents favored the existing legal and regulated brothels, while 31% were against laws that allow prostitution and the remainder were undecided, preferred fewer legal constraints on prostitution, or did not offer an opinion. In 2003, nearly 60% of Nevada residents opposed the legalization of brothels and prostitution in Las Vegas (59% opposed this idea, 35% supported it and 6% did not know or did not answer). Again, support was stronger in the rural areas (where most people were born in Nevada) and weaker in Clark County and Washoe County; women were more opposed to the idea than men.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Lake |first1=Richard |date=October 30, 2003 |title=Majority opposes legalizing prostitution in Las Vegas |work=[[Las Vegas Review-Journal]] |url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2003/Oct-30-Thu-2003/news/22479540.html |access-date=September 10, 2007}}</ref> In 2004, after the closure of the last brothel in Churchill County, a county [[ballot initiative]] to permanently ban prostitution in that county was defeated by a 2β1 margin.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=GARCIA |first1=MARLENE |date=July 31, 2007 |title=Shuttered brothel destroyed in 'suspicious' blaze |url=http://www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20070731/NEWS/107310034 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120517021426/http://www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20070731/NEWS/107310034 |archive-date=May 17, 2012 |website=Lahontan Valley News}}</ref> A July 2011 [[Public Policy Polling]] survey found that 56% of Nevada voters thought that prostitution should be legal, while only 32% thought it should be illegal and 12% were not sure.<ref>{{Cite web |date=August 5, 2011 |title=NV supports prostitution, gay marriage, but not online poker |url=http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NV_0805.pdf |access-date=August 10, 2011 |website=Public Policy Polling}}</ref> A June 2012 [[Public Policy Polling]] survey found that 64% of Nevada voters thought that brothels should be legal in the state, while only 23% thought they should be illegal, and 13% were not sure.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 15, 2012 |title=Nevadans on Adelson, Brothels, Ensign, Etc. |url=http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NV_615.pdf |access-date=June 15, 2012 |website=Public Policy Polling}}</ref> [[2018 Nevada elections|In 2018]], [[Lyon County, Nevada|Lyon County]] voted by a 3-to-1 margin to reject Question 1, which would have repealed the county's brothel ordinance and closed four brothels in [[Mound House, Nevada|Mound House]].<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Alonzo |first1=Amy |date=November 7, 2018 |title=Lyon County voters say keep brothels -- question now goes before commissioners |work=[[Reno Gazette-Journal]] |url=https://www.rgj.com/story/news/local/mason-valley/2018/11/07/lyon-county-voters-say-keep-brothels/1917221002/ |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)