Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Rainforest Action Network
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Controversies== In 2003, the RAN organization was subpoenaed by the [[United States House Committee on Ways and Means|U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means]] to hand over every document and piece of footage relating to all protests the organization participated in since 1993, in order to investigate whether they should be entitled to the tax-exempt status.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Doyle|first=Jim|date=2004-12-17|title=Eco-warriors / Co-founder of Rainforest Action Network and activist spouse take fight for environment one step at a time|url=https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Eco-warriors-Co-founder-of-Rainforest-Action-2663168.php|access-date=2020-11-13|website=SFGATE|language=en-US|archive-date=2020-11-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117144553/https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Eco-warriors-Co-founder-of-Rainforest-Action-2663168.php|url-status=live}}</ref> The organization’s then-Executive Director [[Michael Brune]] labeled this investigation "the latest attempt to intimidate RAN's supporters, and a part of a larger and more disturbing effort by corporate interests to stifle dissent and control free speech."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ran.org/node/2654 |title=Action Alert |publisher=Rainforest Action Network |date=Winter 2004 |access-date=2012-12-30 }}{{Dead link|date=September 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The organization has come under fire from environmentalists opposed to the [[Forest Stewardship Council|Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)]] for its membership in that group,<ref>{{cite web | last = Barry | first = Glen | title = Old-Growth Carbon Findings Cause Forest Protection Schism | url = http://forests.org/blog/2008/09/feature-old-growth-carbon-find.asp | access-date = 2008-09-13 | archive-date = 2008-09-14 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080914114326/http://forests.org/blog/2008/09/feature-old-growth-carbon-find.asp | url-status = dead }}</ref> though RAN maintains that their engagement is necessary to push for stronger protection of forests and the rights of forest communities by the FSC.<ref>{{cite web | last = Rainforest Action Network | title = Rainforest Action Network Statement on the FSC | url = http://ran.org/rainforest-action-network-statement-fsc | access-date = 2012-04-05 | archive-date = 2013-04-01 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130401142443/http://ran.org/rainforest-action-network-statement-fsc | url-status = dead }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)