Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Defamation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Christianity=== {{see also |Canon law}} [[Christianity|Christian]] [[religious text]]s (such as the [[Epistle of James]]{{snd}}full text on [[s:Bible (Douay-Rheims, Challoner)/James|Wikisource]]), [[catechism]]s (like the one commissioned by the [[Council of Trent]]{{snd}}see "[[s:The catechism of the Council of Trent/Part 3: The Eighth Commandment|The Eighth Commandment]]" from its [[Roman Catechism]]), and [[preacher]]s (like [[Jean-Baptiste Massillon]]{{snd}}see his [[sermon]] titled "[[s:Sermons (Massillon)/Sermon 6|On evil-speaking]]"), have argued against expressions (true and false) that can offend others. [[Theology|Theologian]] and catechist [[Joseph Deharbe]], in [[s:A Complete Catechism of the Catholic Religion/Chap. II. The Ten Commandments of God|his interpretation of the Eighth Commandment]], gives practical advice to the [[Glossary of the Catholic Church|faithful]]: The commandment above all forbids giving [[false evidence]] in [[court]]. It is never lawful to tell a lie. In general, forbidden are [[lie]]s, [[hypocrisy]], detraction, calumny, slander, false [[wikt:suspicion|suspicion]], rash [[wikt:judgment|judgment]]; anything that can injure the honour or character of another. With two exceptions: for the good of the guilty, or when necessary to prevent a greater evil{{snd}}and then, only with [[charity (Christian virtue)|charitable]] intentions and without exaggerations. The ''[[Catholic Encyclopedia]]'' has entries for two related concepts, detraction<ref>{{cite Catholic Encyclopedia |wstitle=Detraction |volume=4 |first=Joseph Francis |last=Delany}}</ref> and slander.<ref>{{cite Catholic Encyclopedia |wstitle=Slander |volume=14 |first=Joseph Francis |last=Delany}}</ref> Defamation and calumny seem to be used as synonyms for slander. ====Detraction==== {{further |Detraction}} The [[mortal sin]] of damaging another's good name, by revealing their faults or [[crime]]s (honestly believed real by the detractor). Contrasted with calumny, where the assertions are knowingly false. The degree of sinfulness depends on the harm done, based on three things: * The criminality of the thing alleged * The reputation of the detractor's [[trust (social science)|trustworthiness]] * The dignity or [[wikt:esteem|esteem]] of the victim A relatively small defect alleged against a person of eminent station (a [[bishop]] is given as example) might be a mortal sin. While an offence of considerable magnitude (drunkenness is given as example), attributed to a member of a [[social class]] in which such things frequently happen (a [[sailor]] is given as example), might constitute only a [[venial sin]]. If the victim has been publicly [[sentence (law)|sentenced]], or their misdeeds are already [[wikt:notorious|notorious]], it is [[wikt:lawful|lawful]] to refer to them{{snd}}unless the accused have [[wikt:reformed|reformed]], or their deeds have been forgotten. But this does not apply to particular communities (a [[college]] or [[monastery]] are given as examples), where it would be [[wikt:unlawful|unlawful]] to publish the fact outside said community. But even if the sin is not public, it may be revealed for the [[common good]], or for the benefit of the narrator, listener, or culprit. The damage from failing to reveal another's sin must be balanced against the evil of {{sic |defamation |expected=detraction}}. No more than necessary should be exposed, and [[fraternal correction]] is preferable. [[Journalist]]s are allowed to criticize public officials. [[Historian]]s must be able to document the causes and connections of events, and strengthen public conscience. Those who [[aiding and abetting|abet]] the [[principal (criminal law)|principal]]'s defamation, are also guilty. Detractors (or their [[wikt:heir|heirs]]) must provide restitution. They must restore the victim's [[wikt:fame|fame]] and pay them [[damages]]. According to the text, allegations cannot be taken back, reparation methods proposed by theologians are unsatisfactory, and the only way is finding the right occasion for a favourable characterization of the defamed. ====Slander==== Defined as attributing fault to another, when the slanderer knows they are [[innocence|innocent]]. It combines damaging another's reputation and lying. According to the text, theologians say that the act of lying might not be grievous in itself, but advise mentioning it in [[confession]] to determine reparation methods. The important act is injuring a reputation (hence [[moralism|moralists]] do not consider slander distinct from detraction). The method of injury is negligible. In a somewhat contradictory opinion, it is stated that there are circumstances where misdeeds can be lawfully exposed, but a lie is intrinsically [[evil]] and can never be justified. Slander violates commutative justice, so the perpetrator must make [[restitution (theology)|restitution]]. [[Atonement]] seems achievable by [[wikt:retraction|retracting]] the false statement, which undoes the injury (even if this requires exposing the perpetrator as a liar). Compensation for the victim's losses may also be required.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)