Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Anchoring effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Attitude change === On the contrary of the two previous theories, the attitude change view suggests that individuals' attitude towards an anchor, specifically provided anchors, can heavily affect the extent of the anchoring effect. Recall that individuals often seek to confirm their hypothesis rather than objectively evaluating all information.<ref name=":3" /> When individuals disagree with the provided anchor, they will selectively seek evidence that supports their own attitudes instead of the provided anchor, resulting in an unobserved anchoring effect.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wegener |first1=Duane T. |last2=Petty |first2=Richard E. |last3=Detweiler-Bedell |first3=Brian T. |last4=Jarvis |first4=W.Blair G. |date=January 2001 |title=Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103100914318 |journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=62β69 |doi=10.1006/jesp.2000.1431|url-access=subscription }}</ref> This theory highlights the idea that the distinct anchoring effect observed with self-generated and provided anchors roots from individual attitude (i.e., does the individual believe in the anchor) rather than the anchors themselves, supporting the integrative theory proposed by Simmons and colleagues.<ref name=":2" /> Furthermore, supporters of this view have argued that attitude change is an alternative explanation of the anchoring effect. Providing an anchor generates favorable attitudes in individuals toward the anchor, biasing consequent judgments.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wegener |first1=Duane T. |last2=Petty |first2=Richard E. |last3=Detweiler-Bedell |first3=Brian T. |last4=Jarvis |first4=W.Blair G. |date=January 2001 |title=Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103100914318 |journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=62β69 |doi=10.1006/jesp.2000.1431|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)