Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Fact-checking
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Detecting fake news === {{Main|Fake news}} The term [[fake news]] became popularized with the 2016 United States presidential election, causing concern among some that online media platforms were especially susceptible to disseminating disinformation and misinformation.<ref name=":2" /> Fake news articles tend to come from either satirical news websites or from websites with an incentive to propagate false information, either as clickbait or to serve a purpose.<ref name=EconomicPerspectives>{{Cite journal|last=Allcott|first=Hunt|date=2017|title=Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election." The Journal of Economic Perspectives|url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w23089.pdf|journal=The Journal of Economic Perspectives|volume=31|pages=211β235|doi=10.1257/jep.31.2.211|s2cid=32730475|access-date=2 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191028192904/https://www.nber.org/papers/w23089.pdf|archive-date=28 October 2019|url-status=live|doi-access=free}}</ref> The language, specifically, is typically more inflammatory in fake news than real articles, in part because the purpose is to confuse and generate clicks. Furthermore, modeling techniques such as [[N-gram|n-gram encodings]] and [[Bag-of-words model in computer vision|bag of words]] have served as other linguistic techniques to estimate the legitimacy of a news source. On top of that, researchers have determined that visual-based cues also play a factor in categorizing an article, specifically some features can be designed to assess if a picture was legitimate and provides us more clarity on the news.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Liu|first1=Huan|last2=Tang|first2=Jiliang|last3=Wang|first3=Suhang|last4=Sliva|first4=Amy|last5=Shu|first5=Kai|date=7 August 2017|title=Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective|work =ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter | language=en|arxiv=1708.01967v3|bibcode=2017arXiv170801967S}}</ref> There is also many social context features that can play a role, as well as the model of spreading the news. Websites such as "[[Snopes]]" try to detect this information manually, while certain universities are trying to build mathematical models to assist in this work.<ref name=EconomicPerspectives/>{{Main list|List of fact-checking websites}} {{main cat|Fact-checking websites}} Some individuals and organizations publish their fact-checking efforts on the internet. These may have a special subject-matter focus, such as [[Snopes.com]]'s focus on [[urban legend]]s or the [https://reporterslab.org Reporters' Lab] at Duke University's focus on providing resources to journalists.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)