Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gödel's completeness theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Proofs== Gödel's [[Original proof of Gödel's completeness theorem|original proof of the theorem]] proceeded by reducing the problem to a special case for formulas in a certain syntactic form, and then handling this form with an ''ad hoc'' argument. In modern logic texts, Gödel's completeness theorem is usually proved with [[Leon Henkin|Henkin]]'s proof, rather than with Gödel's original proof. Henkin's proof directly constructs a [[term model]] for any consistent first-order theory. James Margetson (2004) developed a computerized formal proof using the [[Isabelle (theorem prover)|Isabelle]] theorem prover.<ref>{{cite report | url=http://afp.sourceforge.net/entries/Completeness-paper.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060222105036/http://afp.sourceforge.net/entries/Completeness-paper.pdf |archive-date=2006-02-22 |url-status=live | author=James Margetson | title=Proving the Completeness Theorem within Isabelle/HOL | type=Technical Report | date=Sep 2004 }}</ref> Other proofs are also known.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)