Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intellectual
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Criticism == [[File:Portrait of Milton Friedman.jpg|thumb|upright|The economist [[Milton Friedman]] identified the intelligentsia and the business class as interfering with capitalism.]] The French philosopher [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] noted that "the Intellectual is someone who meddles in what does not concern them" ({{Lang|fr|L'intellectuel est quelqu'un qui se mêle de ce qui ne le regarde pas}}).<ref>Annie Cohen-Solal, ''Sartre'', Gallimard, 1989</ref>{{rp|588–9}} [[Noam Chomsky]] expressed the view that "intellectuals are specialists in [[defamation]], they are basically [[political commissar]]s, they are the ideological administrators, the most threatened by [[Dissident|dissidence]]."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Chomsky |first1=Noam |title=Understanding Power |date=2003 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=9780143029915 |page=206}}</ref> In his 1967 article "[[The Responsibility of Intellectuals]]", Chomsky analyzes the intellectual culture in the U.S., and argues that it is largely subservient to [[Power (social and political)|power]]. He is particularly critical of [[Social Science|social scientist]]s and technocrats, who provide a [[Pseudo-science|pseudo-scientific]] justification for the [[State crime|crimes of the state]]. In "An Interview with Milton Friedman" (1974), the American economist [[Milton Friedman]] said that [[businessmen]] and intellectuals are enemies of [[capitalism]]: most intellectuals believed in socialism while businessmen expected economic privileges. In his essay "Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?" (1998), the American [[Libertarianism in the United States|libertarian]] philosopher [[Robert Nozick]] of the [[Cato Institute]] argued that intellectuals become embittered leftists because their superior intellectual work, much rewarded at school and at university, are undervalued and underpaid in the capitalist [[market economy]]. Thus, intellectuals turn against capitalism despite enjoying more socioeconomic status than the average person.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/cpr-20n1-1.html |title=Why do intellectuals oppose capitalism? |first=Robert |last=Nozick |journal=Cato Policy Report |volume=20 |issue=1 |date=January–February 1998 |pages=1, 9–11 }}</ref> The [[Conservatism in the United States|conservative]] economist [[Thomas Sowell]] wrote in his book ''[[Intellectuals and Society]]'' (2010) that intellectuals, who are producers of knowledge, not material goods, tend to speak outside their own areas of expertise, and yet expect social and professional benefits from the [[halo effect]] derived from possessing professional expertise. In relation to other professions, public intellectuals are socially detached from the negative and [[unintended consequences]] of [[public policy]] derived from their ideas. Sowell gives the example of [[Bertrand Russell]] (1872–1970), who advised the British government against national rearmament in the years before the [[Second World War]].<ref>{{cite book|author-last=Sowell| author-first=Thomas|author-link=Thomas Sowell|title=Intellectuals and Society |date=2010|publisher=Basic Books}}</ref>{{rp|218–276}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)