Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Moore's law
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== References == {{reflist|refs= <ref name="Moore 1965">{{cite web|last1=Moore|first1=Gordon E.|title=Cramming more components onto integrated circuits|url=http://cva.stanford.edu/classes/cs99s/papers/moore-crammingmorecomponents.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327213847/https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/05/moores-law-electronics.pdf |archive-date=2019-03-27 |url-status=live |website=intel.com |access-date=April 1, 2020 |author-link=Gordon Moore |publisher=[[Electronics Magazine]] |date=1965-04-19}}</ref> <ref name=Disco1998> {{cite book | last1 = Disco | first1 = Cornelius | last2 = van der Meulen | first2 = Barend | year = 1998 | title = Getting new technologies together | pages = 206β7 | isbn = 978-3-11-015630-0 | publisher = Walter de Gruyter | oclc = 39391108 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=1khslZ-jbgEC&pg=PA206 | access-date = August 23, 2008 }}</ref> <ref name="Moore 1975b" >{{cite web |last1=Moore |first1=Gordon |title=IEEE Technical Digest 1975 |date=1975 |url=http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~agrawvd/COURSE/E7770_Spr07/READ/Gordon_Moore_1975_Speech.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~agrawvd/COURSE/E7770_Spr07/READ/Gordon_Moore_1975_Speech.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |access-date=April 7, 2015 |publisher=Intel Corp. |quote=... the rate of increase of complexity can be expected to change slope in the next few years as shown in Figure 5. The new slope might approximate a doubling every two years, rather than every year, by the end of the decade. }}</ref> <ref name="Byrne2013a">{{cite conference |last1=Byrne |first1=David M. |last2=Oliner |first2=Stephen D. |last3=Sichel |first3=Daniel E. |title=Is the Information Technology Revolution Over? |url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2013/201336/201336pap.pdf |conference=Finance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board |publisher=Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) |place=Washington, D.C. |date=March 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140609182110/http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2013/201336/201336pap.pdf |archive-date=2014-06-09 |quote=technical progress in the semiconductor industry has continued to proceed at a rapid pace ... Advances in semiconductor technology have driven down the constant-quality prices of MPUs and other chips at a rapid rate over the past several decades. }}</ref> <ref name="Myhrvold">{{cite news | title = Moore's Law Corollary: Pixel Power | first = Nathan | last = Myhrvold | author-link = Nathan Myhrvold | work = [[The New York Times]] | date = June 7, 2006 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/07/technology/circuits/07essay.html |access-date=2011-11-27}}</ref> <ref name="Rauch"> {{cite news | first = Jonathan | last = Rauch | author-link = Jonathan Rauch | date = January 2001 | title = The New Old Economy: Oil, Computers, and the Reinvention of the Earth | magazine = [[The Atlantic Monthly]] | url = https://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/01/rauch.htm | access-date = November 28, 2008 }}</ref> <ref name="Keyes 2006"> {{cite news | first = Robert W. | last = Keyes | date = September 2006 | title = The Impact of Moore's Law | magazine = Solid State Circuits Newsletter | volume = 11 | issue = 3 | pages = 25β27 | doi = 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785857 }}</ref> <ref name="Liddle 2006"> {{cite journal | first = David E. | last = Liddle | author-link = David Liddle | date = September 2006 | title = The Wider Impact of Moore's Law | journal = Solid State Circuits Newsletter | volume = 11 | issue = 3 | pages = 28β30 | url = http://www.ieee.org/portal/site/sscs/menuitem.f07ee9e3b2a01d06bb9305765bac26c8/index.jsp?&pName=sscs_level1_article&TheCat=2165&path=sscs/06Sept&file=Liddle.xml | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070713083559/http://www.ieee.org/portal/site/sscs/menuitem.f07ee9e3b2a01d06bb9305765bac26c8/index.jsp?&pName=sscs_level1_article&TheCat=2165&path=sscs/06Sept&file=Liddle.xml | archive-date = 2007-07-13 | access-date = March 25, 2023 | doi = 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785858 | s2cid = 29759395 }}</ref> <ref name="Kendrick 1961 3"> {{cite book |title=Productivity Trends in the United States |last=Kendrick |first=John W. |author-link=John Whitefield Kendrick |year=1961 |publisher= Princeton University Press for NBER|page= 3 }}</ref> <ref name="Moore 2015a"> {{cite interview |last=Moore |first=Gordon |interviewer=Rachel Courtland |title=Gordon Moore: The Man Whose Name Means Progress, The visionary engineer reflects on 50 years of Moore's Law |magazine=IEEE Spectrum: Special Report: 50 Years of Moore's Law |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/gordon-moore-the-man-whose-name-means-progress |quote=We won't have the rate of progress that we've had over the last few decades. I think that's inevitable with any technology; it eventually saturates out. I guess I see Moore's law dying here in the next decade or so, but that's not surprising. |date=March 30, 2015 }}</ref> <ref name="Turing Award Lecture 2018" >{{cite web|url= https://iscaconf.org/isca2018/turing_lecture.html |title= A New Golden Age for Computer Architecture: Domain-Specific Hardware/Software Co-Design, Enhanced Security, Open Instruction Sets, and Agile Chip Development |author1= John L. Hennessy |author2= David A. Patterson |publisher= International Symposium on Computer Architecture β ISCA 2018| quote= In the later 1990s and 2000s, architectural innovation decreased, so performance came primarily from higher clock rates and larger caches. The ending of Dennard Scaling and Moore's Law also slowed this path; single core performance improved only 3% last year! |date = June 4, 2018 }}</ref> <ref name="Bradshaw">{{cite news | title = Intel chief raises doubts over Moore's law | first = Tim | last = Bradshaw | work = Financial Times| date = July 16, 2015 | url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/36b722bc-2b49-11e5-8613-e7aedbb7bdb7.html | access-date=2015-07-16}}</ref> <ref name="Waters">{{cite news | title = As Intel co-founder's law slows, a rethinking of the chip is needed | first = Richard | last = Waters| work = Financial Times| date = July 16, 2015 | url = http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4d8dabaa-2bd5-11e5-acfb-cbd2e1c81cca.html}}</ref> <ref name="Niccolai">{{cite news | title = Intel pushes 10nm chip-making process to 2017, slowing Moore's Law | first = James | last = Niccolai | work = Infoworld | date = July 15, 2015 | url = http://www.infoworld.com/article/2949153/hardware/intel-pushes-10nm-chipmaking-process-to-2017-slowing-moores-law.html |quote=It's official: Moore's Law is slowing down. ... "These transitions are a natural part of the history of Moore's Law and are a by-product of the technical challenges of shrinking transistors while ensuring they can be manufactured in high volume", Krzanich said. |access-date=2015-07-16}}</ref> }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)