Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Multilingualism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Psychology=== A study in 2012 has shown that using a foreign language reduces decision-making biases. It was surmised that the [[Framing effect (psychology)|framing effect]] disappeared when choices are presented in a second language. As human reasoning is shaped by two distinct modes of thought: one that is systematic, analytical and cognition-intensive, and another that is fast, unconscious and emotionally charged, it was believed that a second language provides a useful cognitive distance from automatic processes, promoting analytical thought and reducing unthinking, emotional reaction. Therefore, those who speak two languages have better critical thinking and decision-making skills.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Boaz Keysar |author2=Sayuri L. Hayakawa |author3=Sun Gyu An |date = 18 April 2012 |title = The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases |journal = Psychological Science |volume = 23 |issue = 6 |pages=661β668 |doi = 10.1177/0956797611432178 |pmid=22517192|s2cid=1397617 }}</ref> A study published a year later found that switching to a second language seems to exempt bilinguals from social norms and constraints, such as [[political correctness]].<ref name="ParadowskiGawinkowskaBilewicz2013">{{cite journal |vauthors=Gawinkowska M, Paradowski MB, Bilewicz M |title=Second language as an exemption from sociocultural norms. Emotion-Related Language Choice revisited |journal=PLOS ONE|volume=8 |issue=12 |pages=e8122 |year=2013 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0081225 |pmid=24349044 |pmc=3859501 |bibcode=2013PLoSO...881225G |doi-access=free }}</ref> In 2014, another study showed that people using a foreign language are more likely to make utilitarian decisions when faced with moral dilemmas, such as the [[trolley problem]] and its variations. Participants in this study chose the utilitarian option more often in the Fat Man dilemma when it was presented in a foreign language. For the related Switch Track dilemma, however, the use of a foreign language presented no significant influence on the choices participants made. The authors of this study surmised that a foreign language lacks the emotional impact of one's native language.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Costa | first1=Albert | last2=Foucart | first2=Alice | last3=Hayakawa | first3=Sayuri | last4=Aparici | first4=Melina | last5=Apesteguia | first5=Jose | last6=Heafner | first6=Joy | last7=Keysar | first7=Boaz | title=Your Morals Depend on Language | journal=PLOS ONE | publisher=Public Library of Science (PLoS) | volume=9 | issue=4 | date=23 April 2014 | issn=1932-6203 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0094842 | doi-access=free | pmid=24760073 |pmc=3997430 | bibcode = 2014PLoSO...994842C | page=e94842}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)