Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Preemptive war
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=====Counter proliferation self-help paradigm===== [[File:F-16netz002.jpg|thumb|right|Israeli Air Force F-16A ''[[Netz 107]]'' with 6.5 aerial victory marks and [[Operation Opera|Osirak]] bombing mark]] The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by [[rogue nations]] gave rise to a certain argument by scholars on preemption.<ref>Colonel Guy Roberts, USMC (Ret) 27 ''Denver Journal of International Law & Policyy'' 483</ref><ref>Steven C. Welsh, [http://www.cdi.org/news/law/preemptive-war.cfm Preemptive War and International Law] Center for Defense Information, 5 December 2003</ref><ref>Kacerauskis pp. 84β85</ref> They argued that the threat need not be "imminent" in the classic sense and that the illicit acquisition of the weapons, with their capacity to unleash massive destruction, by rogue states, created the requisite threat to peace and stability as to have justified the use of preemptive force. [[NATO]]'s Deputy Assistant Secretary General for WMD, [[Guy Roberts]], cited the 1962 [[Cuban Missile Crisis]], the 1998 US [[Operation Infinite Reach|attack]] on a [[Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory|Sudanese pharmaceutical plant]], (identified by US intelligence to have been a chemical weapons facility) and the [[Operation Opera|1981 Israeli attack on Iraq's nuclear facility at Osirak]] as examples of the counterproliferation self-help paradigm.<ref>Roberts, n. 528β536</ref> Regarding the Osirak attack, Roberts noted that at the time, few legal scholars argued in support of the Israeli attack, but he noted further that "subsequent events demonstrated the perspicacity of the Israelis, and some scholars have re-visited that attack arguing that it was justified under anticipatory self-defense."<ref>Roberts n. 530β532</ref> After the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, US forces captured a number of documents detailing conversations that Saddam had with his inner sanctum.<ref name="hussein">{{cite news|title=Papers From Iraqi Archive Reveal Conspiratorial Mind-Set of Hussein|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/world/middleeast/archive-offers-rare-glimpse-inside-mind-of-saddam-hussein.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=Saadam%20Hussein&st=cse|author=Gordon, Michael R.|date=25 October 2011|work=New York Times}}</ref> The archive of documents and recorded meetings confirm that [[Saddam Hussein]] was indeed aiming to strike at Israel.<ref name=hussein/> In a 1982 conversation Hussein stated, "Once Iraq walks out victorious, there will not be any Israel." Of Israel's anti-Iraqi endeavors he noted, "Technically, they [the Israelis] are right in all of their attempts to harm Iraq."<ref name=hussein/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)