Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Protected area
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Bhutan as a role model == Scientists advocate that 50% of global land and seas be converted to inter-connected protected areas to sustain these benefits.<ref name="MR">{{Cite journal |last1=Dorji |first1=Sangay |last2=Rajaratnam |first2=Rajanathan |last3=Vernes |first3=Karl |date=1 October 2019 |title=Mammal richness and diversity in a Himalayan hotspot: the role of protected areas in conserving Bhutan's mammals |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01821-9 |journal=Biodiversity and Conservation |language=en |volume=28 |issue=12 |pages=3277β3297 |doi=10.1007/s10531-019-01821-9 |bibcode=2019BiCon..28.3277D |issn=1572-9710 |s2cid=199370519|url-access=subscription }}</ref> The Asian country [[Bhutan]] achieved this high-reaching target by reserving 51.4% of the country's area as protected areas interconnected through [[Wildlife corridor|biological corridors]].<ref name="MR" /> Although these networks are well regulated (local communities are aware of their importance and actively contribute to their maintenance), Bhutan is currently a developing country that is undergoing infrastructure development and resource collection.<ref name="MR" /> The country's economic progression has brought about human-wildlife conflict and increased pressure on the existence of its protected areas. In light of ongoing disputes on the topic of optimal land usage, Dorji (et al.), in a study using camera traps to detect wildlife activity, summarize the results of a nationwide survey that compares the biodiversity of Bhutan's protected areas versus that of intervening non-protected areas. The study indicated that Bhutan's protected areas "are effectively conserving medium and large mammal species, as demonstrated through the significant difference in mammal diversity between protected areas, biological corridors, and non-protected areas with the strongest difference between protected areas and non-protected areas".<ref name="MR" /> Protected areas had the highest levels of mammal biodiversity. This is made possible by the restriction of commercial activity and regulation of consumptive uses (firewood, timber, etc.).<ref name="MR" /> The regulation of such practices has allowed Bhutan's protected areas to thrive with high carnivore diversity and other rare mammals such as [[Chinese pangolin]], [[Indian pangolin]], mountain weasel (''[[Mustela altaica]])'', small-toothed [[Ferret-badger|ferret badger]], [[Asian small-clawed otter|Asian small clawed otter]], the tiger, dhole ''([[Dhole|Cuon alpinus]]''), [[Binturong]], [[clouded leopard]] and Tibetan fox (''[[Tibetan fox|Vulpes ferrilata]])''.<ref name="MR" /> Also found to be prevalent were the large herbivore species: Asiatic water buffalo [[Wild water buffalo|Bubalus arnee]], [[Gee's golden langur|golden langur]], [[musk deer]], and [[Asian elephant]].<ref name="MR" /> The maintenance of these charismatic megafauna and other threatened species can be attributed to the intensity of Bhutan's management of its protected areas and its local communities' commitment to preserving them.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)