Editing Psychosexual development (section)

===Feminist===
{{main article|Feminist views on the Oedipus complex}}
Some feminists criticize Freud's psychosexual development theory as being [[Sexism|sexist]] and [[phallocentric]],<ref name="Johanssen 2021">{{cite book |author-last=Johanssen |author-first=Jacob |year=2021 |chapter=Male fascist bodies – then and now |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C9ZAEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |title=Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition |location=[[New York City|New York]] and [[London]] |publisher=[[Routledge]] |edition=1st |series=The Psychoanalysis and Popular Culture Series |pages=28–51 |doi=10.4324/9781003031581-1 |isbn=9781003031581|s2cid=239145248 }}</ref> arguing that it was overly informed by his own self-analysis. In response to the Freudian concept of [[penis envy]] in the development of the feminine Oedipus complex, the German [[Neo-Freudianism|Neo-Freudian]] psychoanalyst [[Karen Horney]], counter-proposed that girls instead develop "[[Power (philosophy)|Power envy]]" rather than penis envy.<ref name="Johanssen 2021"/> She also proposed the concept of "[[womb and vagina envy]]", the male's envy of the female ability to bear children. Some contemporary theorists suggest, in addition to this, the envy of the woman's perceived right to be the kind parent.<ref name="BerzoffFlanagan2008">{{cite book|last1=Berzoff|first1=Joan|last2=Flanagan|first2=Laura Melano|last3=Hertz|first3=Patricia|title=Inside Out and Outside in: Psychodynamic Clinical Theory and Psychopathology in Contemporary Multicultural Contexts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m457T81-toUC|access-date=19 October 2013|year=2008|publisher=Jason Aronson|location=New York|isbn=978-0-7657-0432-0|pages=229–242}}</ref>