Editing Rutherford scattering experiments (section)

===Alpha particle reflection: the 1909 experiment===
{{anchor| 1909 experiment}}
The results of the initial alpha particle scattering experiments were confusing. The angular spread of the particle on the screen varied greatly with the shape of the apparatus and its internal pressure. Rutherford suggested that Ernest Marsden, a physics undergraduate student studying under Geiger, should look for diffusely reflected or back-scattered alpha particles, even though these were not expected. Marsden's first crude reflector got results, so Geiger helped him create a more sophisticated apparatus. They were able to demonstrate that 1 in 8000 alpha particle collisions were diffuse reflections.<ref name=Baily2013/>{{rp|23}} Although this fraction was small, it was much larger than the Thomson model of the atom could explain.<ref name=Heilbron1968/>{{rp|264}}

{{multiple image
 | direction = horizontal
 | total_width = 300
 | footer = In these experiments, alpha particles emitted by a radioactive source (A) were observed bouncing off a metal reflector (R) and onto a fluorescent screen (S) on the other side of a lead plate (P).
 | image1 = GM-1909-1.gif
 | alt1 =
 | caption1 =
 | image2 = GM-1909-3.gif
 | alt2 =
 | caption2 = 
 }}
These results where published in a 1909 paper, ''On a Diffuse Reflection of the α-Particles'',<ref name=GeigerMarsden1909/> where Geiger and Marsden described the experiment by which they proved that alpha particles can indeed be scattered by more than 90°. In their experiment, they prepared a small conical glass tube (AB) containing "radium emanation" ([[radon]]), "radium A" (actual radium), and "radium C" ([[bismuth]]-214); its open end was sealed with [[mica]].  This was their alpha particle emitter.  They then set up a lead plate (P), behind which they placed a fluorescent screen (S).  The tube was held on the opposite side of plate, such that the alpha particles it emitted could not directly strike the screen.  They noticed a few scintillations on the screen because some alpha particles got around the plate by bouncing off air molecules.  They then placed a metal foil (R) to the side of the lead plate. They tested with lead, gold, tin, aluminium, copper, silver, iron, and platinum. They pointed the tube at the foil to see if the alpha particles would bounce off it and strike the screen on the other side of the plate, and observed an increase in the number of scintillations on the screen. Counting the scintillations, they observed that metals with higher atomic mass, such as gold, reflected more alpha particles than lighter ones such as aluminium.<ref name=GeigerMarsden1909/><ref name=Baily2013/>{{rp|20}}

Geiger and Marsden then wanted to estimate the total number of alpha particles that were reflected.  The previous setup was unsuitable for doing this because the tube contained several radioactive substances (radium plus its decay products) and thus the alpha particles emitted had varying [[Range (particle radiation)|ranges]], and because it was difficult for them to ascertain at what rate the tube was emitting alpha particles.  This time, they placed a small quantity of radium C (bismuth-214) on the lead plate, which bounced off a platinum reflector (R) and onto the screen.  They concluded that approximately 1 in 8,000  of the alpha particles that struck the reflector bounced onto the screen.<ref name=GeigerMarsden1909/> By measuring the reflection from thin foils they showed that the effect due to a volume and not a surface effect.<ref name=LeoneRobotti2018/> When contrasted with the vast number of alpha particles that pass unhindered through a metal foil, this small number of large angle reflections was a strange result<ref name=GilibertiLovisetti/>{{rp|240}} that meant very large forces were involved.<ref name=LeoneRobotti2018/>
{{Clear}}