Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Semantic memory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====ACT-R: a production system model==== The adaptive control of thought (ACT)<ref>Anderson, J. R. (1983). ''The Architecture of Cognition''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</ref> (and later [[ACT-R]] (Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational)<ref>Anderson, J. R. (1993b). ''Rules of the mind''. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</ref>) theory of cognition represents [[declarative memory]] (of which semantic memory is a part) as "chunks", which consist of a label, a set of defined relationships to other chunks (e.g., "this is a _", or "this has a _"), and any number of chunk-specific properties. Chunks can be mapped as a semantic network, given that each node is a chunk with its unique properties, and each link is the chunk's relationship to another chunk. In ACT, a chunk's activation decreases as a function of the time from when the chunk was created, and increases with the number of times the chunk has been retrieved from memory. Chunks can also receive activation from [[Gaussian noise]] and from their similarity to other chunks. For example, if ''chicken'' is used as a retrieval cue, ''canary'' will receive activation by virtue of its similarity to the cue. When retrieving items from memory, ACT looks at the most active chunk in memory; if it is above threshold, it is retrieved; otherwise an "error of omission" has occurred and the item has been forgotten. There is also retrieval latency, which varies inversely with the amount by which the activation of the retrieved chunk exceeds the retrieval threshold. This latency is used to measure the response time of the ACT model and compare it to human performance.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Anderson | first1 = J. R. | last2 = Bothell | first2 = D. | last3 = Lebiere | first3 = C. | last4 = Matessa | first4 = M. | year = 1998 | title = An integrated theory of list memory | journal = Journal of Memory and Language | volume = 38 | issue = 4| pages = 341β380 | doi=10.1006/jmla.1997.2553| citeseerx = 10.1.1.132.7920 | s2cid = 14462252 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)