Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sequent
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Intuitive meaning === {{Refimprove section|date=June 2014|talk=Assertion symbols in sequents do not signify provability.}} A sequent is a [[Formalism (mathematics)|formalized]] statement of [[Proof theory|provability]] that is frequently used when specifying [[proof calculus|calculi]] for [[deductive reasoning|deduction]]. In the sequent calculus, the name ''sequent'' is used for the construct, which can be regarded as a specific kind of [[Judgment (mathematical logic)|judgment]], characteristic to this deduction system. The intuitive meaning of the sequent <math>\Gamma\vdash\Sigma</math> is that under the assumption of Ξ the conclusion of Ξ£ is provable. Classically, the formulae on the left of the turnstile can be interpreted [[logical conjunction|conjunctively]] while the formulae on the right can be considered as a [[logical disjunction|disjunction]]. This means that, when all formulae in Ξ hold, then at least one formula in Ξ£ also has to be true. If the succedent is empty, this is interpreted as falsity, i.e. <math>\Gamma\vdash</math> means that Ξ proves falsity and is thus inconsistent. On the other hand an empty antecedent is assumed to be true, i.e., <math>\vdash\Sigma</math> means that Ξ£ follows without any assumptions, i.e., it is always true (as a disjunction). A sequent of this form, with Ξ empty, is known as a [[logical assertion]]. Of course, other intuitive explanations are possible, which are classically equivalent. For example, <math>\Gamma\vdash\Sigma</math> can be read as asserting that it cannot be the case that every formula in Ξ is true and every formula in Ξ£ is false (this is related to the double-negation interpretations of classical [[intuitionistic logic]], such as [[Glivenko's translation|Glivenko's theorem]]). In any case, these intuitive readings are only pedagogical. Since formal proofs in proof theory are purely [[syntax|syntactic]], the [[semantics|meaning]] of (the derivation of) a sequent is only given by the properties of the calculus that provides the actual [[rule of inference|rules of inference]]. Barring any contradictions in the technically precise definition above we can describe sequents in their introductory logical form. <math>\Gamma</math> represents a set of assumptions that we begin our logical process with, for example "Socrates is a man" and "All men are mortal". The <math>\Sigma</math> represents a logical conclusion that follows under these premises. For example "Socrates is mortal" follows from a reasonable formalization of the above points and we could expect to see it on the <math>\Sigma</math> side of the ''turnstile''. In this sense, <math>\vdash</math> means the process of reasoning, or "therefore" in English.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)