Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Single-bullet theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Forensic use of compositional bullet lead analysis=== The technique used by Guinn to analyse the bullet lead from the JFK assassination was a form of what has become known as Compositional Bullet Lead Analysis (CBLA). Until 2004 the FBI used this technique to determine whether a crime scene bullet lead sample came from a particular box of ammunition or a particular batch of bullets. Guinn claimed that with the JFK bullet fragments, the technique could be used to identify the exact bullet the fragments came from. The validity of CBLA was discredited in a 2002 paper ("A Metallurgical Review of the Interpretation of Compositional Bullet Lead Analysis" (2002), 127 Forensic Science International, 174β191)<ref>http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/randich_2002_FSIpaper.pdf{{full citation needed|date=December 2013}}</ref> co-authored by Randich and by former FBI Chief [[Metallurgist]], William Tobin. The 2002 Tobin/Randich paper prompted the National Academy of Sciences (Board on Chemical Science and Technology) to review the science of bullet lead analysis. In a report in 2004<ref>{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/forensicanalysis0000nati |title=Forensic Analysis Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence |publisher=Books.nap.edu |date=October 11, 2002 |access-date=August 3, 2010 |doi=10.17226/10924 |isbn=978-0-309-09079-7 |url-access=registration }}</ref> the NAS found the scientific basis for matching bullet sources from the analysis of bullet lead composition as practiced by the FBI was flawed. As a result of that report, courts appear to have stopped accepting this evidence<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/cjmag/21-4/ScientificEvidence.pdf |title=Criminal Justice Section | Criminal Justice Section |publisher=Abanet.org |access-date=January 5, 2013}}</ref> and the FBI has stopped using bullet lead analysis for forensic purposes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-laboratory-announces-discontinuation-of-bullet-lead-examinations |title= FBI Laboratory Announces Discontinuation of Bullet Lead Examinations|publisher = FBI National Press Office}}</ref> The NAS report on CBLA, and its relevance to the Guinn's analysis of bullet lead in the JFK assassination, is the subject of comment by Randich and Grant in their 2006 paper at page 719.<ref>http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/JFKpaperJFO_165.PDF{{full citation needed|date=December 2013}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)