Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Universal enveloping algebra
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Coordinate-free=== One can also state the theorem in a coordinate-free fashion, avoiding the use of total orders and basis elements. This is convenient when there are difficulties in defining the basis vectors, as there can be for infinite-dimensional Lie algebras. It also gives a more natural form that is more easily extended to other kinds of algebras. This is accomplished by constructing a [[filtration (mathematics)|filtration]] <math>U_m \mathfrak{g}</math> whose limit is the universal enveloping algebra <math>U(\mathfrak{g}).</math> First, a notation is needed for an ascending sequence of subspaces of the tensor algebra. Let :<math>T_m\mathfrak{g} = K\oplus \mathfrak{g}\oplus T^2\mathfrak{g} \oplus \cdots \oplus T^m\mathfrak{g}</math> where :<math>T^m\mathfrak{g} = T^{\otimes m} \mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{g}\otimes \cdots \otimes \mathfrak{g}</math> is the {{math|''m''}}-times tensor product of <math>\mathfrak{g}.</math> The <math>T_m\mathfrak{g}</math> form a [[filtration (mathematics)|filtration]]: :<math>K\subset \mathfrak{g}\subset T_2\mathfrak{g} \subset \cdots \subset T_m\mathfrak{g} \subset\cdots</math> More precisely, this is a [[filtered algebra]], since the filtration preserves the algebraic properties of the subspaces. Note that the [[limit (category theory)|limit]] of this filtration is the tensor algebra <math>T(\mathfrak{g}).</math> It was already established, above, that quotienting by the ideal is a [[natural transformation]] that takes one from <math>T(\mathfrak{g})</math> to <math>U(\mathfrak{g}).</math> This also works naturally on the subspaces, and so one obtains a filtration <math>U_m \mathfrak{g}</math> whose limit is the universal enveloping algebra <math>U(\mathfrak{g}).</math> Next, define the space :<math>G_m\mathfrak{g} = U_m \mathfrak{g}/U_{m-1} \mathfrak{g}</math> This is the space <math>U_m \mathfrak{g}</math> modulo all of the subspaces <math>U_n \mathfrak{g}</math> of strictly smaller filtration degree. Note that <math>G_m\mathfrak{g}</math> is ''not at all'' the same as the leading term <math>U^m\mathfrak{g}</math> of the filtration, as one might naively surmise. It is not constructed through a set subtraction mechanism associated with the filtration. Quotienting <math>U_m \mathfrak{g}</math> by <math>U_{m-1} \mathfrak{g}</math> has the effect of setting all Lie commutators defined in <math>U_m \mathfrak{g}</math> to zero. One can see this by observing that the commutator of a pair of elements whose products lie in <math>U_{m} \mathfrak{g}</math> actually gives an element in <math>U_{m-1} \mathfrak{g}</math>. This is perhaps not immediately obvious: to get this result, one must repeatedly apply the commutation relations, and turn the crank. The essence of the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem is that it is always possible to do this, and that the result is unique. Since commutators of elements whose products are defined in <math>U_{m} \mathfrak{g}</math> lie in <math>U_{m-1} \mathfrak{g}</math>, the quotienting that defines <math>G_m\mathfrak{g}</math> has the effect of setting all commutators to zero. What PBW states is that the commutator of elements in <math>G_m\mathfrak{g}</math> is necessarily zero. What is left are the elements that are not expressible as commutators. In this way, one is lead immediately to the [[symmetric algebra]]. This is the algebra where all commutators vanish. It can be defined as a filtration <math>S_m \mathfrak{g}</math> of symmetric tensor products <math>\operatorname{Sym}^m \mathfrak{g}</math>. Its limit is the symmetric algebra <math>S(\mathfrak{g})</math>. It is constructed by appeal to the same notion of naturality as before. One starts with the same tensor algebra, and just uses a different ideal, the ideal that makes all elements commute: :<math>S(\mathfrak{g}) = T(\mathfrak{g}) / (a\otimes b - b\otimes a)</math> Thus, one can view the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem as stating that <math>G(\mathfrak{g})</math> is isomorphic to the symmetric algebra <math>S(\mathfrak{g})</math>, both as a vector space ''and'' as a commutative algebra. The <math>G_m\mathfrak{g}</math> also form a filtered algebra; its limit is <math>G(\mathfrak{g}).</math> This is the [[associated graded algebra]] of the filtration. The construction above, due to its use of quotienting, implies that the limit of <math>G(\mathfrak{g})</math> is isomorphic to <math>U(\mathfrak{g}).</math> In more general settings, with loosened conditions, one finds that <math>S(\mathfrak{g})\to G(\mathfrak{g})</math> is a projection, and one then gets PBW-type theorems for the associated graded algebra of a [[filtered algebra]]. To emphasize this, the notation <math>\operatorname{gr}U(\mathfrak{g})</math> is sometimes used for <math>G(\mathfrak{g}),</math> serving to remind that it is the filtered algebra.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)