Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Balassa–Samuelson effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Trade theory implications== The [[supply-side economics|supply-side economists]] (and others) have argued that raising international competitiveness through policies that promote [[traded goods]] sectors' productivity (at the expense of other sectors) will increase a nation's [[GDP]], and increase its [[standard of living]], when compared with treating the sectors equally.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=October 2015}} The Balassa–Samuelson effect might be one reason to oppose this [[trade theory]], because it predicts that: ''a GDP gain in [[traded goods]] does not lead to as much of an improvement in the living standard as an equal GDP increase in the non-traded sector''. (This is due to the effect's prediction that the CPI will increase by more in the former case.)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)