Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cardinality
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Equivalence ==== [[File:Example for a composition of two functions.svg|thumb|Example for a composition of two functions.|282x282px]] A fundamental result necessary in developing a theory of cardinality is showing it is an [[equivalence relation]]. A binary [[Relation (mathematics)|relation]] is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the three basic properties of equality: [[Reflexive relation|reflexivity]], [[Symmetric relation|symmetry]], and [[Transitive relation|transitivity]]. A relation <math>R</math> is reflexive if, for any <math>a,</math> <math>aRa</math> (read: <math>a</math> is <math>R</math>-related to <math>a</math>); symmetric if, for any <math>a</math> and <math>b,</math> if <math>aRb,</math> then <math>bRa</math> (read: if <math>a</math> is related to <math>b,</math> then <math>b</math> is related to <math>a</math>); and transitive if, for any <math>a,</math> <math>b,</math> and <math>c,</math> if <math>aRb</math> and <math>bRc,</math> then <math>aRc.</math> Given any set <math>A,</math> there is a bijection from <math>A</math> to itself by the [[identity function]], therefore cardinality is reflexive. Given any sets <math>A</math> and <math>B,</math> such that there is a bijection <math>f</math> from <math>A</math> to <math>B,</math> then there is an [[inverse function]] <math>f^{-1}</math> from <math>B</math> to <math>A,</math> which is also bijective, therefore cardinality is symmetric. Finally, given any sets <math>A,</math> <math>B,</math> and <math>C</math> such that there is a bijection <math>f</math> from <math>A</math> to <math>B,</math> and <math>g</math> from <math>B</math> to <math>C,</math> then their [[Function composition|composition]] <math>g \circ f</math> (read: <math>g</math> after <math>f</math>) is a bijection from <math>A</math> to <math>C,</math> and so cardinality is transitive. Thus, cardinality forms an equivalence relation. This means that cardinality [[Partition of a set|partitions sets]] into [[equivalence classes]], and one may assign a representative to denote this class. This motivates the notion of a [[Cardinality#Cardinal numbers|cardinal number]]. Somewhat more formally, a relation must be a certain set of [[ordered pairs]]. Since there is no [[set of all sets]] in standard set theory (see: ''{{section link||Cantor's paradox}}''), cardinality is not a relation in the usual sense, but a [[Predicate (logic)|predicate]] or a relation over [[Class (set theory)|classes]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)