Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Evolutionary game theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Eusociality and kin selection=== [[File:Meat eater ant feeding on honey.jpg|thumb|[[Iridomyrmex purpureus|Meat ant]] workers (always female) are related to a parent by a factor of 0.5, to a sister by 0.75, to a child by 0.5 and to a brother by 0.25. Therefore, it is significantly more advantageous to help produce a sister (0.75) than to have a child (0.5).]] {{main|Eusociality}} [[Eusocial]] insect workers forfeit reproductive rights to their queen. It has been suggested that kin selection, based on the genetic makeup of these workers, may predispose them to altruistic behaviours.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Hughes | last2=Oldroyd | last3=Beekman | last4=Ratnieks | year=2008 | title=Ancestral Monogamy Shows Kin Selection Is Key to the Evolution of Eusociality | journal=Science | volume=320 | issue=5880| pages=1213β1216 | doi=10.1126/science.1156108 | pmid=18511689 |bibcode=2008Sci...320.1213H | s2cid=20388889 }}</ref> Most eusocial insect societies have [[haplodiploid]] sexual determination, which means that workers are unusually closely related.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Thorne | first1=B. | year=1997 | title=Evolution of Eusociality in Termites | journal=Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics | volume=28 | issue=1| pages=27β54 | doi=10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.27 | pmc=349550 }}</ref> This explanation of insect eusociality has, however, been challenged by a few highly-noted evolutionary game theorists (Nowak and Wilson)<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Nowak | first1=Tarnita | last2=Wilson | year=2010| title=The evolution of eusociality | journal=Nature | volume=466 | issue=7310| pages=1057β1062 | doi=10.1038/nature09205 | pmid=20740005 | pmc=3279739|bibcode=2010Natur.466.1057N }}</ref> who have published a controversial alternative game theoretic explanation based on a sequential development and group selection effects proposed for these insect species.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Bourke | first1=Andrew | year=2011| title=The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory | journal= Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences| volume=278 | issue=1723| pages=3313β3320 | doi=10.1098/rspb.2011.1465| pmid=21920980 | pmc=3177639}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)