Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hard problem of consciousness
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Philosophical zombies ==== {{Main|Philosophical zombie}} Philosophical zombies are a thought experiment commonly used in discussions of the hard problem.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Seager|first=William|title=Are Zombies Logically Possible?|url=https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~seager/zombie.html|access-date=2020-09-03|website=www.utsc.utoronto.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kaszniak|first1=Alfred W.|last2=Scott|first2=Andrew C.|date=2007|title=Zombie Killer|s2cid=14891432|journal=Association of Scientific Studies of Consciousness}}</ref> They are hypothetical beings physically identical to humans but that lack conscious experience.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Polger|first=Tom|title=Zombies: Entry|url=https://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/zombies.htm|access-date=2020-09-03|website=host.uniroma3.it|archive-date=2020-06-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200615155145/http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/zombies.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> Philosophers such as Chalmers, Joseph Levine, and Francis Kripke take zombies as impossible within the bounds of nature but possible within the bounds of logic.<ref>{{Citation|last=Kirk|first=Robert|title=Zombies|date=2019|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/zombies/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Spring 2019|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2020-09-03}}</ref> This would imply that facts about experience are not logically entailed by the "physical" facts. Therefore, consciousness is irreducible. In Chalmers' words, "after God (hypothetically) created the world, he had more work to do."<ref name=":3">[[David Chalmers]] (1996) ''The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory'', pp. 153β56. Oxford University Press, New York, {{ISBN|0-19-511789-1}} (Pbk.)</ref> Daniel Dennett, a philosopher of mind, criticised the field's use of "the zombie hunch" which he deems an "embarrassment"<ref>Dennett, Daniel (1999), [https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/consciousness/papers/DD-zombie.html "The Zombie Hunch: Extinction of an Intuition?"],{{dead link|date=January 2025}} ''Royal Institute of Philosophy Millennial Lecture''</ref> that ought to "be dropped like a hot potato".<ref name=":1">Dennett, Daniel; commentary on T. Moody, O. Flanagan and T. Polger. "[https://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/unzombie.htm The Unimagined Preposterous of Zombies]", ''Journal of Consciousness Studies'' vol. 2, no. 4, 1995, pp. 322β326.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)