Editing Health informatics (section)

==History, current state and policy initiatives by region and country==

===Americas===
==== Argentina ====
The Argentinian health system is heterogeneous in its function, and because of that, the informatics developments show a heterogeneous stage. Many private health care centers have developed systems, such as the Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, or the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires that also has a residence program for health informatics.{{citation needed|date=August 2022}}

==== Brazil ====
{{Main|Brazilian Society of Health Informatics}}
The first applications of computers to medicine and health care in Brazil started around 1968, with the installation of the first mainframes in public university hospitals, and the use of programmable calculators in scientific research applications. Minicomputers, such as the [[IBM 1130]] were installed in several universities, and the first applications were developed for them, such as the [[hospital census]] in the [[School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto]] and patient master files, in the [[Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo]], respectively at the cities of [[Ribeirão Preto]] and [[São Paulo]] campuses of the [[University of São Paulo]].

In the 1970s, several [[Digital Corporation]] and [[Hewlett-Packard]] minicomputers were acquired for public and Armed Forces hospitals, and more intensively used for [[intensive-care unit]], [[cardiology]] diagnostics, [[patient monitoring]] and other applications. In the early 1980s, with the arrival of cheaper [[microcomputer]]s, a great upsurge of computer applications in health ensued, and in 1986 the [[Brazilian Society of Health Informatics]] was founded, the first [[Brazilian Congress of Health Informatics]] was held, and the first ''Brazilian Journal of Health Informatics'' was published. In Brazil, two universities are pioneers in teaching and research in medical informatics, both the [[University of São Paulo]] and the [[Federal University of São Paulo]] offer undergraduate programs highly qualified in the area as well as extensive graduate programs (MSc and PhD). In 2015 the [[Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre]], [[Rio Grande do Sul]], also started to offer undergraduate program.

==== Canada ====
Health Informatics projects in Canada are implemented provincially, with different provinces creating different systems. A national, federally funded, not-for-profit organisation called [[Canada Health Infoway]] was created in 2001 to foster the development and adoption of electronic health records across Canada. As of December 31, 2008, there were 276 EHR projects under way in Canadian hospitals, other health-care facilities, pharmacies and laboratories, with an investment value of $1.5-billion from Canada Health Infoway.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080218.wmychart18/BNStory/specialScienceandHealth/ | location=Toronto | work=The Globe and Mail | vauthors = Priest L | title=Your medical chart, just a mouse click away | date=2008-02-18}}</ref>

Provincial and territorial programmes include the following:
* [[eHealth Ontario]] was created as an Ontario provincial government agency in September 2008. It has been plagued by delays and its CEO was fired over a multimillion-dollar contracts scandal in 2009.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/head-of-ehealth-ontario-is-fired-amid-contracts-scandal-gets-big-package-1.797216|title= Head of eHealth Ontario is fired amid contracts scandal, gets big package|access-date=2009-08-26 | publisher=CBC News | date=2009-06-07}}</ref>
* [[Alberta Netcare]] was created in 2003 by the Government of Alberta. Today the netCARE portal is used daily by thousands of clinicians. It provides access to demographic data, prescribed/dispensed drugs, known allergies/intolerances, immunizations, laboratory test results, diagnostic imaging reports, the diabetes registry and other medical reports. netCARE interface capabilities are being included in electronic medical record products that are being funded by the provincial government.

==== United States ====
Even though the idea of using computers in medicine emerged as technology advanced in the early 20th century, it was not until the 1950s that informatics began to have an effect in the United States.<ref name="univ">{{cite web |url=http://healthinformatics.uic.edu/history-of-health-informatics |title=The History of Health Informatics |work=Health Informatics, Nursing Informatics and Health Information Management Degrees |publisher=[[University of Illinois at Chicago]] |date=2014-09-09 |access-date=2010-11-08 |archive-date=2012-03-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120312060555/http://healthinformatics.uic.edu/history-of-health-informatics/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

The earliest use of electronic digital computers for medicine was for [[dentistry|dental]] projects in the 1950s at the United States [[National Bureau of Standards]] by [[Robert Ledley]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sittig DF, Ash JS, Ledley RS | title = The story behind the development of the first whole-body computerized tomography scanner as told by Robert S. Ledley | journal = Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | volume = 13 | issue = 5 | pages = 465–69 | year = 2006 | pmid = 16799115 | pmc = 1561796 | doi = 10.1197/jamia.M2127 }}</ref> During the mid-1950s, the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF) carried out several medical projects on its computers while also encouraging civilian agencies such as the [[United States National Research Council|National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council]] (NAS-NRC) and the [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH) to sponsor such work.<ref name="november">{{cite book | vauthors = November JA |title=Biomedical Computing: Digitizing Life in the United States |location=Baltimore |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-4214-0468-4}}</ref> In 1959, Ledley and Lee B. Lusted published "Reasoning Foundations of Medical Diagnosis," a widely read article in ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'', which introduced computing (especially operations research) techniques to medical workers. Ledley and Lusted's article has remained influential for decades, especially within the field of medical decision making.<ref name="Pyle">{{cite journal | vauthors = Pyle KI, Lobel RW, Beck JR | title = Citation analysis of the field of medical decision making: update, 1959–1985 | journal = Medical Decision Making | volume = 8 | issue = 3 | pages = 155–64 | year = 1988 | pmid = 3294550 | doi = 10.1177/0272989X8800800302 | s2cid = 34108803 }}</ref>

Guided by Ledley's late 1950s survey of computer use in biology and medicine (carried out for the NAS-NRC), and by his and Lusted's articles, the NIH undertook the first major effort to introduce computers to biology and medicine. This effort, carried out initially by the NIH's Advisory Committee on Computers in Research (ACCR), chaired by Lusted, spent over $40&nbsp;million between 1960 and 1964 in order to establish dozens of large and small biomedical research centers in the US.<ref name="november"/>

One early (1960, non-ACCR) use of computers was to help quantify normal human movement, as a precursor to scientifically measuring deviations from normal, and design of prostheses.<ref name="pmid14129683">{{cite journal | vauthors = Murray MP, Drought AB, Kory RC | title = Walking patterns of normal men | journal = The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume | volume = 46 | issue = 2| pages = 335–60 | date = March 1964 | pmid = 14129683 | doi = 10.2106/00004623-196446020-00009 }}</ref>  The use of computers (IBM 650, 1620, and 7040) allowed analysis of a large sample size, and of more measurements and subgroups than had been previously practical with mechanical calculators, thus allowing an objective understanding of how human locomotion varies by age and body characteristics. A study co-author was Dean of the Marquette University College of Engineering; this work led to discrete Biomedical Engineering departments there and elsewhere.

The next steps, in the mid-1960s, were the development (sponsored largely by the NIH) of [[expert system]]s such as [[MYCIN]] and [[Internist-I]]. In 1965, the [[National Library of Medicine]] started to use [[MEDLINE]] and [[MEDLARS]]. Around this time, [[Neil Pappalardo]], Curtis Marble, and Robert Greenes developed [[MUMPS]] (Massachusetts General Hospital Utility Multi-Programming System) in [[Octo Barnett]]'s Laboratory of Computer Science<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lcs.mgh.harvard.edu/ |title=MGH – Laboratory of Computer Science |access-date=2009-04-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140802165807/http://lcs.mgh.harvard.edu/ |archive-date=2014-08-02 }}</ref> at [[Massachusetts General Hospital]] in [[Boston]], another center of biomedical computing that received significant support from the NIH.<ref>{{cite book|page=[https://archive.org/details/milestonesincomp0000reil/page/161 161]|title=Milestones in Computer Science and Information Technology|url=https://archive.org/details/milestonesincomp0000reil|url-access=registration| vauthors = Reilly ED |year=2003|isbn=978-1-57356-521-9|publisher=[[Greenwood Press]]}}</ref> In the 1970s and 1980s it was the most commonly used programming language for clinical applications. The [[MUMPS]] operating system was used to support MUMPS language specifications. {{As of|2004}}, a descendant of this system is being used in the [[United States]] [[United States Department of Veterans Affairs|Veterans Affairs]] hospital system. The VA has the largest enterprise-wide health information system that includes an [[electronic medical record]], known as the [[VistA|Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA)]]. A [[graphical user interface]] known as the Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) allows health care providers to review and update a patient's electronic medical record at any of the VA's over 1,000 health care facilities.

During the 1960s, [[Morris F. Collen]], a physician working for [[Kaiser Permanente]]'s Division of Research, developed computerized systems to automate many aspects of multi-phased health checkups. These systems became the basis the larger medical databases Kaiser Permanente developed during the 1970s and 1980s.<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Collen MF |title=A History of Medical Informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990 |location=Bethesda, MD |publisher=American Medical Informatics Association |isbn=978-0-9647743-0-8|year=1995 }}</ref> The [[American Medical Informatics Association]] presents the [[Morris F. Collen Award of Excellence]] for an individual's lifetime achievement in biomedical informatics.

In the 1970s a growing number of commercial vendors began to market practice management and electronic medical records systems. Although many products exist, only a small number of health practitioners use fully featured electronic health care records systems. In 1970, Warner V. Slack, MD, and [[Howard Bleich]], MD, co-founded<ref>{{cite web | url = https://research.bidmc.org/dci/videos | title = Historical Videos of the founding of the Division of Clinical Informatics at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | author = Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians | work = Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.}}</ref> the academic division of clinical informatics (DCI)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://research.bidmc.org/dci | title = Division of Clinical Informatics at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | author = Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians}}</ref> at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School. Warner Slack is a pioneer of the development of the electronic patient medical history,<ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Tanner A | date = 7 January 2017 |title =Patient power through records | newspaper=Boston Globe | url= https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2017/01/07/patient-power-through-records/ejve99vDO4ADXvG5NHsJ0O/story.html |access-date= 2 February 2017 }}</ref> and in 1977 Dr. Bleich created the first user-friendly search engine for the worlds biomedical literature.<ref name="pmid7024808">{{cite journal | vauthors = Horowitz GL, Bleich HL | title = PaperChase: a computer program to search the medical literature | journal = The New England Journal of Medicine | volume = 305 | issue = 16 | pages = 924–30 | date = October 1981 | pmid = 7024808 | pmc = 2580387 | doi = 10.1056/NEJM198110153051605 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Safran C | title = Presentation of Morris F. Collen Award to professors Howard Bleich and Warner Slack | journal = Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | volume = 9 | issue = 4 | pages = 406–8 | date = July–August 2002 | pmid = 12087123 | pmc = 403635 | doi = 10.1197/jamia.M1080 }}</ref>

Computerised systems involved in patient care have led to a number of changes. Such changes have led to improvements in electronic health records which are now capable of sharing medical information among multiple health care stakeholders (Zahabi, Kaber, & Swangnetr, 2015); thereby, supporting the flow of patient information through various modalities of care. One opportunity for [[electronic health record]]s (EHR) to be even more effectively used is to utilize [[natural language processing]] for searching and analyzing notes and text that would otherwise be inaccessible for review. These can be further developed through ongoing collaboration between software developers and end-users of natural language processing tools within the electronic health EHRs.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Turchin A, Florez Builes LF | title = Using Natural Language Processing to Measure and Improve Quality of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review | journal = Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology | volume = 15 | issue = 3 | pages = 553–560 | date = May 2021 | pmid = 33736486 | pmc = 8120048 | doi = 10.1177/19322968211000831 }}</ref>

Computer use today involves a broad ability which includes but is not limited to physician diagnosis and documentation, patient appointment scheduling, and billing. Many researchers in the field have identified an increase in the quality of health care systems, decreased errors by health care workers, and lastly savings in time and money (Zahabi, Kaber, & Swangnetr, 2015). The system, however, is not perfect and will continue to require improvement. Frequently cited factors of concern involve usability, safety, accessibility, and user-friendliness (Zahabi, Kaber, & Swangnetr, 2015).<ref name="reference">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zahabi M, Kaber DB, Swangnetr M | title = Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation | journal = Human Factors | volume = 57 | issue = 5 | pages = 805–34 | date = August 2015 | pmid = 25850118 | doi = 10.1177/0018720815576827 | s2cid = 24450135 }}</ref>

[[Homer R. Warner]], one of the fathers of medical informatics,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Patton GA, Gardner RM | title = Medical informatics education: the University of Utah experience | journal = Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | volume = 6 | issue = 6 | pages = 457–65 | year = 1999 | pmid = 10579604 | pmc = 61389 | doi = 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060457 }}</ref> founded the Department of Medical Informatics at the [[University of Utah]] in 1968. The [[American Medical Informatics Association]] (AMIA) has an award named after him on application of informatics to medicine.

The [[American Medical Informatics Association]] created a,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://amia.org/careers-certifications/clinical-informatics-subspecialty | title=Clinical Informatics Subspecialty}}</ref> board certification for medical informatics from the American Board of Preventive Medicine.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Safran|first1=Charles|last2= Shabot |first2=MM|last3= Munger|first3=BS|last4=Holmes|first4=JH|last5=Steen|first5=EB|last6=Lumpkin|first6=JR|last7=Detmer|first7=DE |title= Program requirements for fellowship education in the subspecialty of clinical informatics|journal=J Am Med Inform Assoc|date=2008 |volume=16|issue=4 |pages=158–66|pmid=19074295|pmc=2649323|doi= 10.1197/jamia.M3046}}</ref> The American Nurses Credentialing Center offers a board certification in Nursing Informatics.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/informatics-nurse/ | title = Informatics Nursing Certification Eligibility Criteria | work = American Nurses Credentialing Center | date = January 1980 | access-date = 18 June 2016 }}</ref> For Radiology Informatics, the CIIP (Certified Imaging Informatics Professional) certification was created by ABII (The American Board of Imaging Informatics) which was founded by SIIM (the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine) and ARRT (the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) in 2005. The CIIP certification requires documented experience working in Imaging Informatics, formal testing and is a limited time credential requiring renewal every five years.

The exam tests for a combination of IT technical knowledge, clinical understanding, and project management experience thought to represent the typical workload of a PACS administrator or other radiology IT clinical support role.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.abii.org/docs/Certification-Guide.pdf | title = Certification Guide | work = American Board of Imaging Informatics | access-date = 18 June 2016 }}</ref>  Certifications from PARCA (PACS Administrators Registry and Certifications Association) are also recognized.  The five PARCA certifications are tiered from entry-level to architect level. The American Health Information Management Association offers credentials in [[medical coding]], analytics, and data administration, such as Registered Health Information Administrator and Certified Coding Associate.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ahima.org/~/media/AHIMA/Files/Certification/MX11310_CertFINAL.ashx?la=en | title = Knowledge Domains | work = American Health Information Management Association | access-date = 18 June 2016 | archive-date = 16 January 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170116083401/http://www.ahima.org/~/media/AHIMA/Files/Certification/MX11310_CertFINAL.ashx?la=en | url-status = dead }}</ref> Certifications are widely requested by employers in health informatics, and overall the demand for certified informatics workers in the United States is outstripping supply.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://burning-glass.com/research/health-informatics-2014/ | title = Missed Opportunities? The Labor Market in Health Informatics, 2014 | work = Burning Glass Technologies | date = December 2014 | access-date = 18 June 2016 }}</ref> The American Health Information Management Association reports that only 68% of applicants pass certification exams on the first try.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ahima.org/~/media/AHIMA/Files/Certification/Summary%20of%20Certification%20Activities.ashx?la=en | title = AHIMA Certification Activities 2015 | work = American Health Information Management Association | access-date = 18 June 2016 | archive-date = 16 June 2016 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160616164042/http://www.ahima.org/~/media/AHIMA/Files/Certification/Summary%20of%20Certification%20Activities.ashx?la=en | url-status = dead }}</ref>

In 2017, a consortium of health informatics trainers (composed of MEASURE Evaluation, Public Health Foundation India, University of Pretoria, Kenyatta University, and the University of Ghana) identified the following areas of knowledge as a curriculum for the [[digital health]] workforce, especially in low- and middle-income countries: clinical decision support; [[telehealth]]; privacy, security, and confidentiality; workflow process improvement; technology, people, and processes; process engineering; quality process improvement and health information technology; computer hardware; software; databases; data warehousing; information networks; information systems; information exchange; data analytics; and usability methods.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/health-informatics-for-low-and-middle-income-countries-short-course-for-health-information-system-professions/|title=Health Informatics for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Short Course for Health Information System Professions – MEASURE Evaluation|website=measureevaluation.org|language=en-us|access-date=2018-10-04|archive-date=2018-10-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005030850/https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/health-informatics-for-low-and-middle-income-countries-short-course-for-health-information-system-professions/|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In 2004, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13335,<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2004-04-30/pdf/04-10024.pdf | title = Executive Order 13335 | date = 30 April 2004 | journal = Federal Register | volume = 69 | issue = 84 | quote = Incentives for the Use of Health Information Technology and Establishing the Position of the National Health Information Technology Coordinator | via = U.S. Government Publishing Office }}</ref> creating the [[Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology]] (ONCHIT) as a division of the U.S. [[Department of Health and Human Services]] (HHS). The mission of this office is widespread adoption of interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) in the US within 10 years. See [[quality improvement organizations]] for more information on federal initiatives in this area. In 2014 the Department of Education approved an advanced Health Informatics Undergraduate program that was submitted by the [[University of South Alabama]]. The program is designed to provide specific Health Informatics education, and is the only program in the country with a Health Informatics Lab. The program is housed in the School of Computing in Shelby Hall, a recently completed $50&nbsp;million state of the art teaching facility. The University of South Alabama awarded David L. Loeser on May 10, 2014, with the first Health Informatics degree.

The program currently is scheduled to have 100+ students awarded by 2016. The [[Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology]] (CCHIT), a private nonprofit group, was funded in 2005 by the U.S. [[Department of Health and Human Services]] to develop a set of standards for [[electronic health record]]s (EHR) and supporting networks, and certify vendors who meet them. In July 2006, CCHIT released its first list of 22 certified ambulatory EHR products, in two different announcements.<ref>{{cite web | work = Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology | date = 18 July 2006 | url = http://www.cchit.org/media/press+releases/CCHIT+Announces+First+Certified+Electronic+Health+Record+Products.htm | archive-url = https://archive.today/20060811163534/http://www.cchit.org/media/press+releases/CCHIT+Announces+First+Certified+Electronic+Health+Record+Products.htm | url-status = usurped | archive-date = August 11, 2006 | title = CCHIT Announces First Certified Electronic Health Record Products | access-date = 26 July 2006 }}</ref> [[Harvard Medical School]] added a department of biomedical informatics in 2015.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://cbmi.med.harvard.edu/ |title = The Department of Biomedical Informatics (DBMI) | work = Blavatnik Institute | publisher = Harvard Medical School }}</ref> The [[University of Cincinnati]] in partnership with [[Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center]] created a biomedical informatics (BMI) Graduate certificate program and in 2015 began a BMI PhD program.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/research/divisions/b/bmi/ |title = Biomedical Informatics Research | work = Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://med.uc.edu/bmi/ |title = Biomedical Informatics &#124; | work = UC Cincinnati College of Medicine }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://med.uc.edu/bmigrad/ |title = BMI Graduate Program | work = UC Cincinnati College of Medicine }}</ref> The joint program allows for researchers and students to observe the impact their work has on patient care directly as discoveries are translated from bench to bedside. 

===Europe===
{{further|European Federation for Medical Informatics}}

==== European Union ====
The European Commission's preference, as exemplified in the 5th Framework<ref>{{cite web | url = https://cordis.europa.eu/about/archives | title = Fifth Framework Programme (FP5: 1998-2002) | work = CORDIS | publisher = European Commission }}</ref> as well as currently pursued pilot projects,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.epsos.eu/ |title=European Patient Smart Open Services |access-date=2019-09-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150816054504/http://www.epsos.eu/ |archive-date=2015-08-16 }}</ref> is for Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) for health care.

The European Union's Member States are committed to sharing their best practices and experiences to create a European eHealth Area, thereby improving access to and quality health care at the same time as stimulating growth in a promising new industrial sector. The European eHealth Action Plan plays a fundamental role in the European Union's strategy. Work on this initiative involves a collaborative approach among several parts of the Commission services.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/policy_action_plan/index_en.htm | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110319023217/http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/policy/index_en.htm | archive-date = 19 March 2011 | title = European eHealth Action Plan | publisher = European Commission }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/index_en.htm | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101206000055/http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/index_en.htm | archive-date = 6 December 2010 | title = European eHealth Action Plan i2010 | publisher = European Commission }}</ref> The [[European Institute for Health Records]] is involved in the promotion of high quality [[electronic health record]] systems in the [[European Union]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Electronic Health Records for Europe|year=2005|url=http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Telemedicine_Alliance/SEMWC7SMD6E_0.html|publisher=[[European Space Agency]]|access-date=2009-01-13}}</ref>

==== UK ====
The broad history of health informatics has been captured in the book ''UK Health Computing: Recollections and reflections'', Hayes G, Barnett D (Eds.), BCS (May 2008) by those active in the field, predominantly members of BCS Health and its constituent groups. The book describes the path taken as "early development of health informatics was unorganized and idiosyncratic". In the early 1950s, it was prompted by those involved in NHS finance and only in the early 1960s did solutions including those in pathology (1960), radiotherapy (1962), immunization (1963), and primary care (1968) emerge.  Many of these solutions, even in the early 1970s were developed in-house by pioneers in the field to meet their own requirements. In part, this was due to some areas of health services (for example the immunization and vaccination of children) still being provided by Local Authorities.

The coalition government has proposed broadly to return to the 2010 strategy Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS (July 2010); stating: "We will put patients at the heart of the NHS, through an [[information revolution]] and greater choice and control' with shared decision-making becoming the norm: "no decision about me without me' and patients having access to the information they want, to make choices about their care. They will have increased control over their own care records."{{citation needed|date=October 2019}}

There are different models of health informatics delivery in each of the home countries (England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales) but some bodies like UKCHIP<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ukchip.org/ | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180227025129/http://www.ukchip.org/ | archive-date = 27 February 2018 | title = UKCHIP }}</ref> (see below) operate for those 'in and for' all the home countries and beyond.

NHS informatics in England was contracted out to several vendors for national health informatics solutions under the National Programme for Information Technology [[NPfIT#Deliverables|(NPfIT)]] label in the early to mid-2000s, under the auspices of NHS Connecting for Health (part of the Health and Social Care Information Centre as of 1 April 2013). NPfIT originally divided the country into five regions, with strategic 'systems integration' contracts awarded to one of several Local Service Providers (LSP).

The various specific technical solutions were required to connect securely with the NHS 'Spine', a system designed to broker data between different systems and care settings. NPfIT fell significantly behind schedule and its scope and design were being revised in real time, exacerbated by media and political lambasting of the Programme's spend (past and projected) against the proposed budget. In 2010 a consultation was launched as part of the new Conservative/Liberal Democrat Coalition Government's White Paper "Liberating the NHS". This initiative provided little in the way of innovative thinking, primarily re-stating existing strategies within the proposed new context of the Coalition's vision for the NHS.
The degree of computerization in NHS secondary care was quite high before NPfIT, and the programme stagnated further development of the install base – the original NPfIT regional approach provided neither a single, nationwide solution nor local health community agility or autonomy to purchase systems, but instead tried to deal with a hinterland in the middle.

Almost all general practices in England and Wales are computerized under the GP Systems of Choice<ref>{{cite web | url = http://systems.hscic.gov.uk/gpsoc | title = GP Systems of Choice (GPSoC) | work = National Health Service | publisher = United Kingdom }}</ref> programme, and patients have relatively extensive computerized primary care clinical records. System choice is the responsibility of individual general practices and while there is no single, standardized GP system, it sets relatively rigid minimum standards of performance and functionality for vendors to adhere to. Interoperation between primary and secondary care systems is rather primitive. It is hoped that a focus on interworking (for interfacing and integration) standards will stimulate synergy between primary and secondary care in sharing necessary information to support the care of individuals.  Notable successes to date are in the electronic requesting and viewing of test results, and in some areas, GPs have access to digital x-ray images from secondary care systems.

In 2019 the GP Systems of Choice framework was replaced by the GP IT Futures framework, which is to be the main vehicle used by [[clinical commissioning group]]s to buy services for GPs.  This is intended to increase competition in an area that is dominated by  [[EMIS Health|EMIS]] and [[The Phoenix Partnership|TPP]].  69 technology companies offering more than 300 solutions have been accepted on to the new framework.<ref>{{cite news |title=Number of primary care IT suppliers to quadruple |url=https://www.hsj.co.uk/technology-and-innovation/number-of-primary-care-it-suppliers-to-quadruple/7026180.article |access-date=1 December 2019 |work=Health Service Journal |date=22 October 2019}}</ref>

Wales has a dedicated Health Informatics function that supports NHS Wales in leading on the new integrated digital information services and promoting Health Informatics as a career.

The British Computer Society (BCS) <ref>{{cite web |title=British Computer Society |url=https://www.bcs.org |access-date=14 August 2022}}</ref> provides 4 different professional registration levels for Health and Care Informatics Professionals: Practitioner, Senior Practitioner, Advanced Practitioner, and Leading Practitioner. [[The Faculty of Clinical Informatics]] (FCI) <ref>{{cite web |title=Faculty of Clinical Informatics |url=https://facultyofclinicalinformatics.org.uk/what-is-the-fci |access-date=14 August 2022 |archive-date=14 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814174418/https://facultyofclinicalinformatics.org.uk/what-is-the-fci |url-status=dead }}</ref> is the professional membership society for health and social care professionals in clinical informatics offering Fellowship, Membership and Associateship. BCS and FCI are member organizations of the Federation for Informatics Professionals in Health and Social Care (FedIP),<ref>{{cite web |title=Federation for Informatics Professionals |url=https://www.fedip.org |access-date=14 August 2022}}</ref> a collaboration between the leading professional bodies in health and care informatics supporting the development of the informatics professions.

[[The Faculty of Clinical Informatics]] has produced a Core Competency Framework that describes the wide range of skills needed by practitioners.<ref>{{cite web |title=Core Competency Framework Reports |url=https://facultyofclinicalinformatics.org.uk/ccf-reports |website=The Faculty of Clinical Informatics |access-date=19 September 2022 |archive-date=20 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920172708/https://facultyofclinicalinformatics.org.uk/ccf-reports |url-status=dead }}</ref>

==== Netherlands ====
In the Netherlands, health informatics is currently a priority for research and implementation. The Netherlands Federation of University medical centers (NFU)<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nfu.nl/english/about-the-nfu/ | title=English &#124; About the NFU | access-date=2016-12-19 | archive-date=2023-03-08 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230308130110/https://www.nfu.nl/english/about-the-nfu/ | url-status=dead }}</ref> has created the ''Citrienfonds'', which includes the programs eHealth and Registration at the Source.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nfu.nl/patientenzorg/citrien | title=Patiëntenzorg &#124; Citrienfonds | access-date=2016-12-19 | archive-date=2020-10-05 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201005060437/https://www.nfu.nl/patientenzorg/citrien/ | url-status=dead }}</ref> The Netherlands also has the national organizations Society for Healthcare Informatics (VMBI)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.efmi.org/about/efmi-countries/netherlands |title = Netherlands|date = 2 October 2019}}</ref> and Nictiz, the national center for standardization and eHealth.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.nictiz.nl/over-nictiz/english | title=English | access-date=2016-12-19 | archive-date=2017-09-24 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170924160610/https://www.nictiz.nl/over-nictiz/english | url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Asia and Oceania===
In Asia and Australia-New Zealand, the regional group called the [[Asia Pacific Association for Medical Informatics]] (APAMI)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.apami.org |title=Asia Pacific Association of Medical Informatics}}</ref> was established in 1994 and now consists of more than 15 member regions in the Asia Pacific Region.

==== Australia ====
The [[Australasian College of Health Informatics]] (ACHI) is the professional association for health informatics in the Asia-Pacific region. It represents the interests of a broad range of clinical and non-clinical professionals working within the health informatics sphere through a commitment to quality, standards and ethical practice.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ACHI.org.au|title=Australasian College of Health Informatics|access-date=3 May 2010}}Australasian College of Health Informatics</ref> ACHI is an academic institutional member of the [[International Medical Informatics Association]] (IMIA)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imia.org/members/profiles/academic.lasso?-Search=Action&-Table=CGI&-MaxRecords=1&-SkipRecords=2&-Database=organizations&-SortField=english_vers&-SortOrder=ascending&type=academic&approved=yes|title=International Medical Informatics Association – Academic Institutional Members |publisher =Australian College of Health Informatics|date=12 August 2009|access-date=22 February 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706094511/http://imia.org/members/profiles/academic.lasso?-Search=Action&-Table=CGI&-MaxRecords=1&-SkipRecords=2&-Database=organizations&-SortField=english_vers&-SortOrder=ascending&type=academic&approved=yes|archive-date=6 July 2010}}</ref> and a full member of the Australian Council of Professions.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ACHI.org.au | title = ACHI Memberships | work =  Australasian College of Health Informatics (ACHI) }}</ref>
ACHI is a sponsor of the "e-Journal for Health Informatics",<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ejhi.net/ojs/index.php/ejhi/about/journalSponsorship | title = eJHI Journal of Health Informatics | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110723113638/http://www.ejhi.net/ojs/index.php/ejhi/about/journalSponsorship | archive-date = 2011-07-23 }} (open access journal)</ref> an indexed and peer-reviewed professional journal. ACHI has also supported the "[[Australian Health Informatics Education Council]]" (AHIEC) since its founding in 2009.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.AHIEC.org.au | work = Australian Health Informatics Education Council (AHIEC) | title = AHIEC Auspicing Organisations }}</ref>

Although there are a number of health informatics organizations in Australia, the [[Health Informatics Society of Australia]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hisa.org.au|title=Health Informatics Society of Australia Ltd|access-date=3 April 2010}}</ref> (HISA) is regarded as the major umbrella group and is a member of the [[International Medical Informatics Association]] (IMIA). Nursing informaticians were the driving force behind the formation of HISA, which is now a company limited by guarantee of the members. The membership comes from across the informatics spectrum that is from students to corporate affiliates. HISA has a number of branches (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia) as well as special interest groups such as nursing (NIA), pathology, aged and community care, industry and medical imaging (Conrick, 2006).

==== China ====
After 20 years, [[China]] performed a successful transition from its planned economy to a [[socialist market economy]]. Along this change, China's health care system also experienced a significant reform to follow and adapt to this historical revolution. In 2003, the data (released from [[Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China]] (MoH)), indicated that the national health care-involved expenditure was up to [[RMB]] 662.33&nbsp;billion totally, which accounted for about 5.56% of nationwide gross domestic products. Before the 1980s, the entire health care costs were covered in central government annual budget. Since that, the construct of health care-expended supporters started to change gradually. Most of the expenditure was contributed by health insurance schemes and private spending, which corresponded to 40% and 45% of total expenditure, respectively. Meanwhile, the financially governmental contribution was decreased to 10% only. On the other hand, by 2004, up to 296,492 health care facilities were recorded in statistic summary of MoH, and an average of 2.4 clinical beds per 1000 people were mentioned as well.<ref name="IJMI76-p614-620">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhang Y, Xu Y, Shang L, Rao K | title = An investigation into health informatics and related standards in China | journal = International Journal of Medical Informatics | volume = 76 | issue = 8 | pages = 614–20 | date = August 2007 | pmid = 16793329 | doi = 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.003 }}</ref>

[[File:Proportion of nation-wide hospitals with HIS.tif|thumbnail|Proportion of nationwide hospitals with HIS in China by 2004]]
Along with the development of information technology since the 1990s, health care providers realized that the information could generate significant benefits to improve their services by computerized cases and data, for instance of gaining the information for directing patient care and assessing the best patient care for specific clinical conditions. Therefore, substantial resources were collected to build China's own health informatics system.

Most of these resources were arranged to construct [[hospital information system]] (HIS), which was aimed to minimize unnecessary waste and repetition, subsequently to promote the efficiency and quality-control of health care.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Guo J, Takada A, Niu T, He M, Tanaka K, Sato J, Suzuki M, Takahashi K, Daimon H, Suzuki T, Nakashima Y, Araki K, Yoshihara H | title = Enhancement of CLAIM (clinical accounting information) for a localized Chinese version | journal = Journal of Medical Systems | volume = 29 | issue = 5 | pages = 463–71 | date = October 2005 | pmid = 16180482 | doi = 10.1007/s10916-005-6103-7 | s2cid = 17540005 }}</ref> By 2004, China had successfully spread HIS through approximately 35–40% of nationwide hospitals.<ref name="pmid15569497">{{cite journal | vauthors = Wang XJ, Hu J, Wang K, Yu H, Luo M, Lei WY | title = Setting-up and preliminary performance of the interactive teleradiological conference system based on virtual private network | journal = Chinese Medical Journal | volume = 117 | issue = 11 | pages = 1735–38 | date = November 2004 | pmid = 15569497 }}</ref> However, the dispersion of hospital-owned HIS varies critically. In the east part of China, over 80% of hospitals constructed HIS, in northwest of China the equivalent was no more than 20%. Moreover, all of the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] (CDC) above rural level, approximately 80% of health care organisations above the rural level and 27% of hospitals over town level have the ability to perform the transmission of reports about real-time epidemic situation through public health information system and to analysis infectious diseases by dynamic statistics.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors= Rao KQ, Wang CY, Hu JP |title= Introduction of the National Public Health Emergency Response Information Systems Project |journal= [[Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine]] |volume=1 |pages=2–5 |year=2005}}</ref>

China has four tiers in its health care system. The first tier is street health and workplace clinics and these are cheaper than hospitals in terms of medical billing and act as prevention centers. The second tier is district and enterprise hospitals along with specialist clinics and these provide the second level of care. The third tier is provisional and municipal general hospitals and teaching hospitals which provided the third level of care. In a tier of its own is the national hospitals which are governed by the Ministry of Health. China has been greatly improving its health informatics since it finally opened its doors to the outside world and joined the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2001, it was reported that China had 324,380 medical institutions and the majority of those were clinics. The reason for that is that clinics are prevention centers and Chinese people like using traditional Chinese medicine as opposed to Western medicine and it usually works for the minor cases. China has also been improving its higher education in regards to health informatics.

At the end of 2002, there were 77 medical universities and medical colleges. There were 48 university medical colleges which offered bachelor, master, and doctorate degrees in medicine. There were 21 higher medical specialty institutions that offered diploma degrees so in total, there were 147 higher medical and educational institutions. Since joining the WTO, China has been working hard to improve its education system and bring it up to international standards.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://jhi.sagepub.com/content/9/4/211.full.pdf|volume=9|issue=4|pages=211–23|doi=10.1177/1460458203094008|date=December 2003| vauthors = Wu MX, Yu P, Soar J |title=The Current Status of Health Informatics Higher Education in China|journal=Health Informatics Journal|s2cid=1699875}}</ref>
SARS played a large role in China quickly improving its health care system. Back in 2003, there was an outbreak of SARS and that made China hurry to spread HIS or Hospital Information System and more than 80% of hospitals had HIS. China had been comparing itself to Korea's health care system and figuring out how it can better its own system. There was a study done that surveyed six hospitals in China that had HIS. The results were that doctors did not use computers as much so it was concluded that it was not used as much for clinical practice than it was for administrative purposes. The survey asked if the hospitals created any websites and it was concluded that only four of them had created websites and that three had a third-party company create it for them and one was created by the hospital staff. In conclusion, all of them agreed or strongly agreed that providing health information on the Internet should be utilized.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kim J, Piao M, Jingwu W | title = The Current Status of Hospital Information Systems in Yanbian, China. | journal = Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics | date = March 2009 | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | pages = 133–40 | doi = 10.4258/jksmi.2009.15.1.133 | hdl = 10371/81954 | url = http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0088JKSMI/jksmi-15-133.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200710231011/https://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0088JKSMI/jksmi-15-133.pdf | archive-date = 10 July 2020 | hdl-access = free }}</ref>

Collected information at different times, by different participants or systems could frequently lead to issues of misunderstanding, dis-comparing or dis-exchanging. To design an issues-minor system, health care providers realized that certain standards were the basis for sharing information and interoperability, however a system lacking standards would be a large impediment to interfere the improvement of corresponding information systems. Given that the standardization for health informatics depends on the authorities, standardization events must be involved with government and the subsequently relevant funding and supports were critical. In 2003, the Ministry of Health released the Development Lay-out of National Health Informatics (2003–2010)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.moh.gov.cn/uploadfile/200406/2004629144259379.doc |title=Development Layout of National Health Information|access-date=2017-11-03}}</ref> indicating the identification of standardization for health informatics which is 'combining adoption of international standards and development of national standards'.

In China, the establishment of standardization was initially facilitated with the development of vocabulary, [[Medical classification|classification and coding]], which is conducive to reserve and transmit information for premium management at national level. By 2006, 55 international/ domestic standards of vocabulary, classification and coding have served in hospital information system. In 2003, the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems ([[ICD-10]]) and the [[ICD-10 Clinical Modification]] (ICD-10-CM) were adopted as standards for diagnostic classification and acute care procedure classification. Simultaneously, the [[International Classification of Primary Care]] (ICPC) were translated and tested in China 's local applied environment.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S | title = The openEHR Foundation | journal = Studies in Health Technology and Informatics|volume=115|pages=153–73|year=2005| pmid = 16160223 }}</ref>
Another coding standard, named [[Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes]] (LOINC), was applied to serve as general identifiers for clinical observation in hospitals.

Personal identifier codes were widely employed in different information systems, involving name, sex, nationality, family relationship, educational level and job occupation. However, these codes within different systems are inconsistent, when sharing between different regions. Considering this large quantity of vocabulary, classification and coding standards between different jurisdictions, the health care provider realized that using multiple systems could generate issues of resource wasting and a non-conflicting national level standard was beneficial and necessary. Therefore, in late 2003, the health informatics group in Ministry of Health released three projects to deal with issues of lacking national health information standards, which were the Chinese National Health Information Framework and Standardization, the Basic Data Set Standards of Hospital Information System and the Basic Data Set Standards of Public Health Information System.

The objectives of the Chinese National Health Information Framework and Standardization project were:<ref name="IJMI76-p614-620" />
# Establish national health information framework and identify in what areas standards and guidelines are required
# Identify the classes, relationships and attributes of national health information framework. Produce a conceptual health data model to cover the scope of the health information framework
# Create [[logical data model]] for specific domains, depicting the logical data entities, the data attributes, and the relationships between the entities according to the conceptual health data model
# Establish uniform represent standard for data elements according to the data entities and their attributes in conceptual data model and logical data model
# Circulate the completed health information framework and health data model to the partnership members for review and acceptance
# Develop a process to maintain and refine the China model and to align with and influence international health data models

===== Comparing China's EHR Standard and ASTM E1384 =====
In 2011, researchers from local universities evaluated the performance of China's [[Electronic Health Record]] (EHR) Standard compared with the [[American Society for Testing and Materials]] Standard Practice for Content and Structure of Electronic Health Records in the United States (ASTM E1384 Standard, withdrawn in 2017).<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors = Xu W, Guan Z, Cao H, Zhang H, Lu M, Li T |title = Analysis and evaluation of the Electronic Health Record standard in China: a comparison with the American national standard ASTM E1384 |journal = International Journal of Medical Informatics |volume = 80 |issue = 8 |pages = 555–61 |date = August 2011 |pmid = 21680236 |doi = 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.05.003}}</ref> The deficiencies that were found are listed in the following.
# The lack of supporting on privacy and security. The ISO/TS 18308 specifies "The EHR must support the ethical and legal use of personal information, in accordance with established privacy principles and frameworks, which may be culturally or jurisdictionally specific" ([[ISO]] 18308: Health Informatics-Requirements for an Electronic Health Record Architecture, 2004). However this China's EHR Standard did not achieve any of the fifteen requirements in the subclass of privacy and security.
# The shortage of supporting on different types of data and reference. Considering only [[ICD-9]] is referenced as China's external international coding systems, other similar systems, such as [[SNOMED CT]] in clinical terminology presentation, cannot be considered as familiar for Chinese specialists, which could lead to internationally information-sharing deficiency.
# The lack of more generic and extensible lower level data structures. China's large and complex EHR Standard was constructed for all medical domains. However, the specific and time-frequent attributes of clinical data elements, value sets and templates identified that this once-for-all purpose cannot lead to practical consequence.<ref name="Lévy_2006">{{cite journal |vauthors = Lévy PP, Duché L, Darago L, Dorléans Y, Toubiana L, Vibert JF, Flahault A |title = ICPCview: visualizing the International Classification of Primary Care |journal = Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |volume = 116 |pages = 623–28 |year = 2005 |pmid = 16160327}}</ref>

In [[Hong Kong]], a computerized patient record system called the Clinical Management System (CMS) has been developed by the [[Hospital Authority]] since 1994. This system has been deployed at all the sites of the authority (40 hospitals and 120 clinics). It is used for up to 2&nbsp;million transactions daily by 30,000 clinical staff. The comprehensive records of 7&nbsp;million patients are available on-line in the [[electronic patient record]] (ePR), with data integrated from all sites. Since 2004 radiology image viewing has been added to the ePR, with radiography images from any HA site being available as part of the ePR.

The [[Hong Kong Hospital Authority]] placed particular attention to the [[governance]] of clinical systems development, with input from hundreds of clinicians being incorporated through a structured process. The health informatics section in the Hospital Authority<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ha.org.hk/hi/Welcome.html | title = Health informatics section in Hong Kong Hospital Authority }}</ref> has a close relationship with the information technology department and clinicians to develop health care systems for the organization to support the service to all public hospitals and clinics in the region.

The [[Hong Kong Society of Medical Informatics]] (HKSMI) was established in 1987 to promote the use of information technology in health care. The eHealth Consortium has been formed to bring together clinicians from both the private and public sectors, medical informatics professionals and the IT industry to further promote IT in health care in Hong Kong.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iproa.org/ProjectDetail.action?id=270 | title = eHealth Consortium | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060628223826/http://www.iproa.org/ProjectDetail.action?id=270 | archive-date=2006-06-28 | work = Internet Professional Association Limited }}</ref>

==== India ====
{{See also|Indian Association for Medical Informatics}}
* eHCF School of Medical Informatics<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ehcfsmi.edu.in | title = eHCF School of Medical Informatics }}</ref>
* eHealth-Care Foundation<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ehealth-care.net | title = eHealth-Care Foundation }}</ref>

==== Malaysia ====
Since 2010, the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been working on the [[Malaysian Health Data Warehouse]] (MyHDW) project. MyHDW aims to meet the diverse needs of timely health information provision and management, and acts as a platform for the standardization and integration of health data from a variety of sources (Health Informatics Centre, 2013). The Ministry of Health has embarked on introducing the electronic Hospital Information Systems (HIS) in several public hospitals including Putrajaya Hospital, Serdang Hospital and Selayang Hospital. Similarly, under Ministry of Higher Education, hospitals such as University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) and University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) are also using HIS for healthcare delivery.

A [[hospital information system]] (HIS) is a comprehensive, integrated information system designed to manage the administrative, financial and clinical aspects of a hospital. As an area of medical informatics, the aim of hospital information system is to achieve the best possible support of patient care and administration by electronic data processing. HIS plays a vital role in planning, initiating, organizing and controlling the operations of the subsystems of the hospital and thus provides a synergistic organization in the process.

==== New Zealand ====
Health informatics is taught at five New Zealand universities. The most mature and established programme has been offered for over a decade at Otago.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://homepages.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~peterk/healthinformatics/tec-hi-report-06.pdf |title=Health Informatics Capability Development in New Zealand – A Report to the Tertiary Education Commission |first1=Karolyn |last1=Kerr |first2=Rowena |last2=Cullen |first3=Jan |last3=Duke |first4=Alec |last4=Holt | name-list-style = vanc |year=2006 |access-date=2009-01-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080920185858/http://homepages.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~peterk/healthinformatics/tec-hi-report-06.pdf |archive-date=2008-09-20 }}</ref> Health Informatics New Zealand (HINZ), is the national organization that advocates for health informatics. HINZ organizes a conference every year and also publishes a journal, ''Healthcare Informatics Review Online''.

=== Saudi Arabia ===
The Saudi Association for Health Information (SAHI) was established in 2006<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.imia.org/members/profiles/national.lasso?-Search=Action&-Table=CGI&-MaxRecords=1&-SkipRecords=27&-Database=organizations&-KeyField=Internal%20Record%20ID&-SortField=country&-SortOrder=ascending&-SortField=country&-SortOrder=ascending&type=national&type=national |title=Medical Pharmaceutical Information Association (MedPharmInfo) |publisher=Imia.org |date=2008-05-18 |access-date=2010-07-29 }}{{Dead link|date=August 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> to work under direct supervision of [[King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences]] to practice public activities, develop theoretical and applicable knowledge, and provide scientific and applicable studies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sahi.org.sa/objectives.php|title=Saudi Association for Health Informatics (SAHI)|work=sahi.org.sa|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100824102810/http://www.sahi.org.sa/objectives.php|archive-date=2010-08-24}}</ref>

=== Russia ===
The Russian health care system is based on the principles of the Soviet health care system, which was oriented on mass prophylaxis, prevention of infection and epidemic diseases, vaccination and immunization of the population on a socially protected basis. The current government health care system consists of several directions:
* Preventive health care
* Primary health care
* Specialized medical care
* Obstetrical and gynecologic medical care
* Pediatric medical care
* Surgery
* Rehabilitation/ Health resort treatment
One of the main issues of the post-Soviet medical health care system was the absence of the united system providing optimization of work for medical institutes with one, single database and structured appointment schedule and hence hours-long lines. Efficiency of medical workers might have been also doubtful because of the paperwork administrating or lost book records.

Along with the development of the information systems IT and health care departments in [[Moscow]] agreed on design of a system that would improve public services of health care institutes. Tackling the issues appearing in the existing system, the Moscow Government ordered that the design of a system would provide simplified electronic booking to public clinics and automate the work of medical workers on the first level.

The system designed for that purposes was called [[EMIAS]] (United Medical Information and Analysis System) and presents an [[electronic health record]] (EHR) with the majority of other services set in the system that manages the flow of patients, contains outpatient card integrated in the system, and provides an opportunity to manage consolidated managerial accounting and personalized list of medical help. Besides that, the system contains information about availability of the medical institutions and various doctors.

The implementation of the system started in 2013 with the organization of one computerized database for all patients in the city, including a front-end for the users. [[EMIAS]] was implemented in Moscow and the region and it is planned that the project should extend to most parts of the country.