Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Jargon
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Accessibility and criticism == With the rise of the [[self-advocacy]] within the [[Disability rights movement|Disability Rights Movement]], "jargonized" language has started to face repeated rejection for being language that is widely inaccessible.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Irfan |first=Hanan Khaja Mohammad |date=2022-04-04 |title=Analysis of Epistemic Gatekeeping Engendered by Abstruse Academic Cant in STEM and HUMSS : Analysis of Elitist, Inaccessible Academic Language in Science and Humanities |url=https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/smart/ijelts/2022/00000004/00000003/art00007 |journal=International Journal of English Learning & Teaching Skills |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=58β69 |doi=10.15864/ijelts.4307|doi-broken-date=28 February 2025 |s2cid=248951825 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> However, jargon is largely present in everyday language such as in newspapers, financial statements, and instruction manuals. To combat this, several advocacy organizations are working on influencing public agents to offer accessible information in different formats.<ref name="Northampton">{{cite web|url=http://www.northampton.gov.uk/info/200041/equality_and_diversity/1309/jargon_buster| title=Jargon buster β Accessible Information * splat !| last=Lundin|first=Leigh| date=2013-04-05|work=Northampton Borough Council}}</ref> One accessible format that offers an alternative to jargonized language is "[[easy read]]", which consists of a combination of plain language<ref name=":3" /> and images. The criticism against jargon can be found in certain fields where professionals communicate with individuals with no industry background. In a study done by analyzing 58 patients and 10 [[radiation therapist]]s, professionals diagnosed and explained the treatment of a disease to a patient with the use of jargon. It was found that using jargon left patients confused about what the treatments and risks were, suggesting that jargon in the [[medical field]] is not the best in communicating the terminology and concepts.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schnitzler |first1=Lena |display-authors=et al |date=9 August 2016 |title=Communication during radiation therapy education sessions: The role of medical jargon and emotional support in clarifying patient confusion |journal=Patient Education and Counseling |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=112β120 |doi=10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.006 |pmid=27542311}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)