Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Johnson–Nyquist noise
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Nyquist's derivation of ideal resistor noise == [[File:Nyquist-transmission-line-derivation-of-johnson-noise-with-voltage-sources.svg|thumb|396x396px|Figure 5. Schematic of [[Harry Nyquist|Nyquist's]] 1928 [[thought experiment]]<ref name="Nyquist" /><ref name=":0" /> using two noisy resistors (each represented here by a noise-free resistor in series with a noise voltage source) connected via a long lossless [[transmission line]] of length <math>l </math>. Each resistor's noise [[Analog signal|signal]] propagates across the line at velocity <math>\text{v} </math>. All impedances are identical, so both signals are absorbed by the opposite resistor instead of being [[signal reflections|reflected]].<br><br>Nyquist then imagined [[Short circuit|shorting]] both ends of the line, thereby trapping in-flight energy on the line. Because all in-flight energy is now completely reflected (due to the now-mismatched impedance), the in-flight energy can be represented as a summation of sinusoidal [[standing waves]]. For a band of frequencies <math>\Delta f </math>, there are <math>2l \, \Delta f / \text{v}</math> [[Normal mode#Standing waves|modes of oscillation]].{{NoteTag|A standing wave occurs with frequency equal to every integer multiple of <math>\tfrac{\text{v}}{2l}</math>. The line is sufficiently long to make the number of modes within the bandwidth very large, such that the modes will be close enough in frequency to approximate a continuous frequency spectrum.}} Each mode provides <math>k_{\rm B} T</math> [[KT (energy)|of energy]] on average, of which <math>k_{\rm B} T / 2</math> is electric and <math>k_{\rm B} T / 2</math> is magnetic, so the total energy in that bandwidth on average is <math>k_{\rm B} T \cdot 2l \, \Delta f / \text{v} . </math> Each resistor contributed <math>k_{\rm B} T \cdot l \, \Delta f / \text{v} </math> (half of that total energy).<br><br>But since before the shorting there were originally no reflections, the value of that total in-flight energy also equals the combined energy that was transferred from both resistors to the line during the transit time interval of <math>l / \text{v} </math>. Dividing the average '''energy''' transferred from ''each'' resistor to the line by the transit '''time''' interval results in a total '''power''' of <math>k_{\rm B} T \, \Delta f </math> transferred over bandwidth <math>\Delta f </math> on average from each resistor.]] Nyquist's 1928 paper "Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors"<ref name="Nyquist" /> used concepts about [[Equipartition theorem#Potential energy and harmonic oscillators|potential energy and harmonic oscillators from the equipartition law]] of [[Ludwig Boltzmann|Boltzmann]] and [[James Clerk Maxwell|Maxwell]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Tomasi |first=Wayne |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LXPWxmakFVgC |title=Electronic Communication |date=1994 |publisher=Prentice Hall PTR |isbn=9780132200622 |language=en}}</ref> to explain Johnson's experimental result. Nyquist's [[thought experiment]] summed the energy contribution of each [[Normal mode#Standing waves|standing wave mode of oscillation]] on a long lossless [[transmission line]] between two equal resistors (<math>R_1 {=} R_2</math>). According to the conclusion of Figure 5, the total average power transferred over bandwidth <math>\Delta f </math> from <math>R_1</math> and absorbed by <math>R_2</math> was determined to be: : <math>\overline {P_1} = k_{\rm B} T \, \Delta f \, . </math> Simple application of [[Ohm's law]] says the current from <math>V_1</math> (the thermal voltage noise of only <math>R_1</math>) through the combined resistance is <math display="inline">I_1 {=} \tfrac{V_1}{R_1 + R_2} {=} \tfrac{V_1}{2R_1}</math>, so the power transferred from <math>R_1</math> to <math>R_2</math> is the square of this current multiplied by <math>R_2</math>, which simplifies to:<ref name="Nyquist" /> : <math>P_\text{1} = I_1^2 R_2 = I_1^2 R_1 = \left( \frac{V_1}{2R_1} \right)^2 R_1 = \frac{V_1^2}{4R_1} \, .</math> Setting this <math display="inline">P_\text{1}</math> equal to the earlier average power expression <math display="inline">\overline {P_1}</math> allows solving for the average of <math display="inline">V_1^2</math> over that bandwidth: : <math>\overline{V_1^2} = 4 k_\text{B} T {R_1} \, \Delta f \, .</math> Nyquist used similar reasoning to provide a generalized expression that applies to non-equal and [[Johnson–Nyquist noise#Complex impedances|complex impedances]] too. And while Nyquist above used <math>k_{\rm B} T</math> according to [[Classical physics|classical]] theory, Nyquist concluded his paper by attempting to use a more involved expression that incorporated the [[Planck constant]] <math>h</math> (from the new theory of [[quantum mechanics]]).<ref name="Nyquist" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)