Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Master and Commander
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===First US and UK publications 1969 / 70=== [[C. S. Forester|C S Forester]] having died just a few years earlier, some critics were left bewildered and disappointed by the complexity of O'Brian's creation after the predictability of the [[Horatio Hornblower|Hornblower]] series.{{sfn|Bennett|1994|p=159}} "Not, I think, memorable, at least in the Hornblower way" wrote the ''[[Irish Press]]'',<ref>Poole, H J ''[[Irish Press]]'', 21 January 1970, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=161}}</ref> while according to the ''[[Library Journal]]'', "Mourning Hornblower fans may prefer to read a good if disappointing new book rather than to reread one of the master's epics".<ref>Taylor, David C., ''[[Library Journal]]'', 15 December 1969, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=160}}</ref> The reception of other critics was more positive. In the US, [[The New York Times Book Review|The ''New York Times Book Review'']] noted the author's "delightful subtlety", and his "easy command of the philosophical, political, sensual and social temper of the times [that] flavors a rich entertainment",<ref name=Levin1969>{{cite news |url=http://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1969/12/14/issue.html |newspaper=The New York Times |department=Book Reviews |url-access=registration |first=Martin |last=Levin |title=Master and Commander |date=14 December 1969 |access-date=13 February 2014}}</ref> while ''[[Kirkus Reviews]]'' said that the book was "A welcome treat for sea hounds who care more for belaying pins than ravaged bodices below decks".<ref>''[[Kirkus Reviews]]'', 1 October 1969, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=160}}</ref> Several UK press reviewers were also impressed. The ''[[Sunday Mirror]]'' said "Nothing is glamourised. The press gangings, the squalor are all here....The battle scenes are tremendous...This is not secondhand [[C. S. Forester|Forester]], but a really fine piece of writing",<ref>''[[Sunday Mirror]]'', 18 January 1970, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=160}}</ref> while [[Benedict Nightingale]] writing in ''[[The Observer]]'' called the book "Dashing, well-timbered, pickled in the period, and with strong human tensions and cross-currents".<ref>[[Benedict Nightingale|Nightingale, Benedict]], ''Observer'', 18 January 1970, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=161}}</ref> According to [[Tom Pocock]] in ''[[London Evening Standard|The Evening Standard]],'' "It is as though, under Mr O'Brian's touch, those great sea-paintings at Greenwich had stirred and come alive".<ref>Pocock, Tom, ''[[London Evening Standard]]'', 20 January 1970, quoted in {{harvnb|Bennett|1994|p=161}}</ref> The sailor [[Francis Chichester|Sir Francis Chichester]], recently returned from his 1967 single-handed voyage round the world, described the book as "the best sea story I have ever read",{{sfn|Ollard|1994|p=23}} a quote which the publishers adopted for use on the novel's front cover. Also used on the book's jacket in Britain was a heartfelt quote from the author [[Mary Renault]], "A spirited sea-tale with cracking pace and a brilliant sense of period. In a highly competitive field it goes straight to the top. A real first-rater".{{sfn|King|2000|p=213}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)