Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Matroid
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Matroids from linear algebra=== [[File:fano plane.svg|thumb|The Fano matroid, derived from the [[Fano plane]]. It is [[GF(2)]]-linear but not real-linear.]] [[File:Vamos matroid.svg|thumb|The [[Vámos matroid]], not linear over any field]] Matroid theory developed mainly out of a deep examination of the properties of independence and dimension in vector spaces. There are two ways to present the matroids defined in this way: : If <math>E</math> is any finite subset of a [[vector space]] <math>V</math>, then we can define a matroid <math>M</math> on <math>E</math> by taking the independent sets of <math>M</math> to be the [[linear independence|linearly independent]] subsets of <math>E</math>. The validity of the independent set axioms for this matroid follows from the [[Steinitz exchange lemma]]. : If <math>M</math> is a matroid that can be defined in this way, we say the set <math>E</math> ''[[matroid representation|represents]]'' <math>M</math>. : Matroids of this kind are called ''vector matroids''. An important example of a matroid defined in this way is the Fano matroid, a rank three matroid derived from the [[Fano plane]], a [[finite geometry]] with seven points (the seven elements of the matroid) and seven lines (the proper nontrivial flats of the matroid). It is a linear matroid whose elements may be described as the seven nonzero points in a three dimensional vector space over the [[finite field]] [[GF(2)]]. However, it is not possible to provide a similar representation for the Fano matroid using the [[real number]]s in place of GF(2). A [[matrix (mathematics)|matrix]] <math>A</math> with entries in a [[field (mathematics)|field]] gives rise to a matroid <math>M</math> on its set of columns. The dependent sets of columns in the matroid are those that are linearly dependent as vectors. : This matroid is called the ''column matroid'' of <math>A</math>, and <math>A</math> is said to ''represent'' <math>M</math>. For instance, the Fano matroid can be represented in this way as a 3 × 7 [[Logical matrix|(0,1) matrix]]. Column matroids are just vector matroids under another name, but there are often reasons to favor the matrix representation.{{efn| There is one technical difference: A column matroid can have distinct elements that are the same vector, but a vector matroid as defined above cannot. Usually this difference is insignificant and can be ignored, but by letting <math>E</math> be a [[multiset]] of vectors one brings the two definitions into complete agreement. }} A matroid that is equivalent to a vector matroid, although it may be presented differently, is called ''representable'' or ''linear''. If <math>M</math> is equivalent to a vector matroid over a [[field (mathematics)|field]] <math>F</math>, then we say <math>M</math> is ''representable over'' {{nobreak|<math>F</math>;}} in particular, <math>M</math> is ''real representable'' if it is representable over the real numbers. For instance, although a graphic matroid (see below) is presented in terms of a graph, it is also representable by vectors over any field. A basic problem in matroid theory is to characterize the matroids that may be represented over a given field <math>F</math>; [[Rota's conjecture]] describes a possible characterization for every [[finite field]]. The main results so far are characterizations of [[binary matroid]]s (those representable over GF(2)) due to [[W. T. Tutte|Tutte]] (1950s), of ternary matroids (representable over the 3 element field) due to Reid and Bixby, and separately to [[Paul Seymour (mathematician)|Seymour]] (1970s), and of quaternary matroids (representable over the 4 element field) due to {{harvp|Geelen|Gerards|Kapoor|2000}}. A proof of Rota's conjecture was announced, but not published, in 2014 by Geelen, Gerards, and Whittle.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Solving Rota's conjecture|journal=Notices of the American Mathematical Society|url=http://www.ams.org/notices/201407/rnoti-p736.pdf|date=Aug 17, 2014|pages=736–743}}</ref> A [[regular matroid]] is a matroid that is representable over all possible fields. The [[Vámos matroid]] is the simplest example of a matroid that is not representable over any field.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)