Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Randomized controlled trial
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Restricted ==== To balance group sizes in smaller RCTs, some form of [[restricted randomization|"restricted" randomization]] is recommended.<ref name="Lachin-1988b" /> The major types of restricted randomization used in RCTs are: * [[Randomized block design|Permuted-block randomization]] or blocked randomization: a "block size" and "allocation ratio" (number of subjects in one group versus the other group) are specified, and subjects are allocated randomly within each block.<ref name="Schulz-2002" /> For example, a block size of 6 and an allocation ratio of 2:1 would lead to random assignment of 4 subjects to one group and 2 to the other. This type of randomization can be combined with "[[stratified randomization]]", for example by center in a [[multicenter trial]], to "ensure good balance of participant characteristics in each group."<ref name="Moher-2010" /> A special case of permuted-block randomization is ''random allocation'', in which the entire sample is treated as one block.<ref name="Schulz-2002" /> The major disadvantage of permuted-block randomization is that even if the block sizes are large and randomly varied, the procedure can lead to selection bias.<ref name="Lachin-1988a" /> Another disadvantage is that "proper" analysis of data from permuted-block-randomized RCTs requires stratification by blocks.<ref name="Lachin-1988b" /> * Adaptive biased-coin randomization methods (of which urn randomization is the most widely known type): In these relatively uncommon methods, the probability of being assigned to a group decreases if the group is overrepresented and increases if the group is underrepresented.<ref name="Schulz-2002" /> The methods are thought to be less affected by selection bias than permuted-block randomization.<ref name="Lachin-1988b" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)