Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Topological vector space
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Examples== ===Finest and coarsest vector topology=== Let <math>X</math> be a real or complex vector space. '''Trivial topology''' The '''[[trivial topology]]''' or '''indiscrete topology''' <math>\{X, \varnothing\}</math> is always a TVS topology on any vector space <math>X</math> and it is the coarsest TVS topology possible. An important consequence of this is that the intersection of any collection of TVS topologies on <math>X</math> always contains a TVS topology. Any vector space (including those that are infinite dimensional) endowed with the trivial topology is a compact (and thus [[locally compact]]) [[Complete topological vector space|complete]] [[Metrizable topological vector space|pseudometrizable]] [[Seminormed space|seminormable]] [[Locally convex topological vector space|locally convex]] topological vector space. It is [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] if and only if <math>\dim X = 0.</math> '''Finest vector topology''' There exists a TVS topology <math>\tau_f</math> on <math>X,</math> called the '''{{visible anchor|finest vector topology}}''' on <math>X,</math> that is finer than every other TVS-topology on <math>X</math> (that is, any TVS-topology on <math>X</math> is necessarily a subset of <math>\tau_f</math>).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-04-22|title=A quick application of the closed graph theorem|url=https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/04/22/a-quick-application-of-the-closed-graph-theorem/|access-date=2020-10-07| website=What's new| language=en}}</ref>{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|p=111}} Every linear map from <math>\left(X, \tau_f\right)</math> into another TVS is necessarily continuous. If <math>X</math> has an uncountable [[Hamel basis]] then <math>\tau_f</math> is {{em|not}} [[Locally convex topological vector space|locally convex]] and {{em|not}} [[Metrizable topological vector space|metrizable]].{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|p=111}} ===Cartesian products=== A [[Cartesian product]] of a family of topological vector spaces, when endowed with the [[product topology]], is a topological vector space. Consider for instance the set <math>X</math> of all functions <math>f: \R \to \R</math> where <math>\R</math> carries its usual [[Euclidean topology]]. This set <math>X</math> is a real vector space (where addition and scalar multiplication are defined pointwise, as usual) that can be identified with (and indeed, is often defined to be) the [[Cartesian product]] <math>\R^\R,,</math> which carries the natural [[product topology]]. With this product topology, <math>X := \R^{\R}</math> becomes a topological vector space whose topology is called {{em|the topology of [[pointwise convergence]] on <math>\R.</math>}} The reason for this name is the following: if <math>\left(f_n\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> is a [[sequence]] (or more generally, a [[Net (mathematics)|net]]) of elements in <math>X</math> and if <math>f \in X</math> then <math>f_n</math> [[limit of a sequence|converges]] to <math>f</math> in <math>X</math> if and only if for every real number <math>x,</math> <math>f_n(x)</math> converges to <math>f(x)</math> in <math>\R.</math> This TVS is [[Complete topological vector space|complete]], [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]], and [[locally convex]] but not [[Metrizable topological vector space|metrizable]] and consequently not [[normable]]; indeed, every neighborhood of the origin in the product topology contains lines (that is, 1-dimensional vector subspaces, which are subsets of the form <math>\R f := \{r f : r \in \R\}</math> with <math>f \neq 0</math>). ===Finite-dimensional spaces=== By [[F. Riesz's theorem]], a Hausdorff topological vector space is finite-dimensional if and only if it is [[locally compact]], which happens if and only if it has a compact [[Neighborhood (topology)|neighborhood]] of the origin. Let <math>\mathbb{K}</math> denote <math>\R</math> or <math>\Complex</math> and endow <math>\mathbb{K}</math> with its usual Hausdorff normed [[Euclidean topology]]. Let <math>X</math> be a vector space over <math>\mathbb{K}</math> of finite dimension <math>n := \dim X</math> and so that <math>X</math> is vector space isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{K}^n</math> (explicitly, this means that there exists a [[linear isomorphism]] between the vector spaces <math>X</math> and <math>\mathbb{K}^n</math>). This finite-dimensional vector space <math>X</math> always has a unique {{em|[[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]]}} vector topology, which makes it TVS-isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{K}^n,</math> where <math>\mathbb{K}^n</math> is endowed with the usual Euclidean topology (which is the same as the [[product topology]]). This Hausdorff vector topology is also the (unique) [[Comparison of topologies|finest]] vector topology on <math>X.</math> <math>X</math> has a unique vector topology if and only if <math>\dim X = 0.</math> If <math>\dim X \neq 0</math> then although <math>X</math> does not have a unique vector topology, it does have a unique {{em|Hausdorff}} vector topology. * If <math>\dim X = 0</math> then <math>X = \{0\}</math> has exactly one vector topology: the [[trivial topology]], which in this case (and {{em|only}} in this case) is Hausdorff. The trivial topology on a vector space is Hausdorff if and only if the vector space has dimension <math>0.</math> * If <math>\dim X = 1</math> then <math>X</math> has two vector topologies: the usual [[Euclidean topology]] and the (non-Hausdorff) trivial topology. ** Since the field <math>\mathbb{K}</math> is itself a <math>1</math>-dimensional topological vector space over <math>\mathbb{K}</math> and since it plays an important role in the definition of topological vector spaces, this dichotomy plays an important role in the definition of an [[absorbing set]] and has consequences that reverberate throughout [[functional analysis]]. {{math proof | title=Proof outline| proof = The proof of this dichotomy (i.e. that a vector topology is either trivial or isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{K}</math>) is straightforward so only an outline with the important observations is given. As usual, <math>\mathbb{K}</math> is assumed have the (normed) Euclidean topology. Let <math>B_r := \{a \in \mathbb{K} : |a| < r\}</math> for all <math>r > 0.</math> Let <math>X</math> be a <math>1</math>-dimensional vector space over <math>\mathbb{K}.</math> If <math>S \subseteq X</math> and <math>B \subseteq \mathbb{K}</math> is a ball centered at <math>0</math> then <math>B \cdot S = X</math> whenever <math>S</math> contains an "unbounded sequence", by which it is meant a sequence of the form <math>\left(a_i x\right)_{i=1}^{\infty}</math> where <math>0 \neq x \in X</math> and <math>\left(a_i\right)_{i=1}^{\infty} \subseteq \mathbb{K}</math> is unbounded in normed space <math>\mathbb{K}</math> (in the usual sense). Any vector topology on <math>X</math> will be translation invariant and invariant under non-zero scalar multiplication, and for every <math>0 \neq x \in X,</math> the map <math>M_x : \mathbb{K} \to X</math> given by <math>M_x(a) := a x</math> is a continuous linear bijection. Because <math>X = \mathbb{K} x</math> for any such <math>x,</math> every subset of <math>X</math> can be written as <math>F x = M_x(F)</math> for some unique subset <math>F \subseteq \mathbb{K}.</math> And if this vector topology on <math>X</math> has a neighborhood <math>W</math> of the origin that is not equal to all of <math>X,</math> then the continuity of scalar multiplication <math>\mathbb{K} \times X \to X</math> at the origin guarantees the existence of an open ball <math>B_r \subseteq \mathbb{K}</math> centered at <math>0</math> and an open neighborhood <math>S</math> of the origin in <math>X</math> such that <math>B_r \cdot S \subseteq W \neq X,</math> which implies that <math>S</math> does {{em|not}} contain any "unbounded sequence". This implies that for every <math>0 \neq x \in X,</math> there exists some positive integer <math>n</math> such that <math>S \subseteq B_n x.</math> From this, it can be deduced that if <math>X</math> does not carry the trivial topology and if <math>0 \neq x \in X,</math> then for any ball <math>B \subseteq \mathbb{K}</math> center at 0 in <math>\mathbb{K},</math> <math>M_x(B) = B x</math> contains an open neighborhood of the origin in <math>X,</math> which then proves that <math>M_x</math> is a linear [[homeomorphism]]. [[Q.E.D.]] <math>\blacksquare</math> }} * If <math>\dim X = n \geq 2</math> then <math>X</math> has {{em|infinitely many}} distinct vector topologies: ** Some of these topologies are now described: Every linear functional <math>f</math> on <math>X,</math> which is vector space isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{K}^n,</math> induces a [[seminorm]] <math>|f| : X \to \R</math> defined by <math>|f|(x) = |f(x)|</math> where <math>\ker f = \ker |f|.</math> Every seminorm induces a ([[Metrizable TVS|pseudometrizable]] [[locally convex]]) vector topology on <math>X</math> and seminorms with distinct kernels induce distinct topologies so that in particular, seminorms on <math>X</math> that are induced by linear functionals with distinct kernels will induce distinct vector topologies on <math>X.</math> ** However, while there are infinitely many vector topologies on <math>X</math> when <math>\dim X \geq 2,</math> there are, {{em|up to TVS-isomorphism}}, only <math>1 + \dim X</math> vector topologies on <math>X.</math> For instance, if <math>n := \dim X = 2</math> then the vector topologies on <math>X</math> consist of the trivial topology, the Hausdorff Euclidean topology, and then the infinitely many remaining non-trivial non-Euclidean vector topologies on <math>X</math> are all TVS-isomorphic to one another. ===Non-vector topologies=== '''Discrete and cofinite topologies''' If <math>X</math> is a non-trivial vector space (that is, of non-zero dimension) then the [[discrete topology]] on <math>X</math> (which is always [[Metrizable space|metrizable]]) is {{em|not}} a TVS topology because despite making addition and negation continuous (which makes it into a [[topological group]] under addition), it fails to make scalar multiplication continuous. The [[cofinite topology]] on <math>X</math> (where a subset is open if and only if its complement is finite) is also {{em|not}} a TVS topology on <math>X.</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)