Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Chinese space program
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== NASA's policy excluding Chinese state affiliates === {{Further|Wolf Amendment}} The [[Cox Report]], released in 1999, alleged that following decades of intelligence operations against U.S. weapons laboratories conducted by the [[Ministry of State Security of the People's Republic of China|Ministry of State Security]], [[Chinese espionage in the United States|China stole]] design information regarding advanced [[thermonuclear weapon]]s. In 2011, Congress passed a law prohibiting [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|NASA]] researchers from working with [[People's Republic of China|Chinese]] citizens affiliated with a Chinese state enterprise or entity without FBI certification or using NASA funds to host Chinese visitors.<ref name="justice1">{{citation|first1=Virginia |last1=Seitz |title=Memorandum Opinion for the General Counsel, Office of Science and Technology Policy |url=https://www.justice.gov/olc/2011/conduct-diplomacy.pdf |journal=Office of Legal Counsel |volume=35 |date=11 September 2011 |access-date=23 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120713080223/http://www.justice.gov/olc/2011/conduct-diplomacy.pdf |archive-date=13 July 2012 }}</ref> In March 2013, the U.S. Congress passed legislation barring Chinese nationals from entering NASA facilities without a waiver from NASA.<ref name="guardiannasa">{{cite news|last=Ian Sample|title=US scientists boycott Nasa conference over China ban|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/05/us-scientists-boycott-nasa-china-ban|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=5 October 2013|date=2013-10-05}}</ref> The history of the U.S. exclusion policy can be traced back to the [[Cox Report]]'s allegations that the technical information that American companies provided China for its commercial satellite ended up improving Chinese intercontinental ballistic missile technology.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/a23402/will-nasa-ever-work-with-china/|title=Will NASA Ever Work With China?|last1=Oberhaus|first1=Daniel|date=October 18, 2016|website=Popular Mechanic|access-date=July 31, 2018}}</ref> This was further aggravated in 2007 when China blew up a defunct meteorological satellite in [[low Earth orbit]] to test a ground-based [[Anti-satellite weapon|anti-satellite (ASAT) missile]]. The debris created by the explosion contributed to the [[Space debris|space junk]] that litter Earth's orbit, exposing other nations' space assets to the risk of accidental collision.<ref name=":3" /> The United States also fears the Chinese application of dual-use space technology for nefarious purposes.<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|title=The Ashgate Research Companion to Chinese Foreign Policy|last1=Kavalski|first1=Emilian|publisher=Routledge|year=2016|isbn=9781409422709|location=Oxon|pages=404}}</ref> The Chinese response to the exclusion policy involved its own space policy of opening up its space station to the outside world, welcoming scientists coming from all countries.<ref name=":4" /> American scientists have also boycotted NASA conferences due to its rejection of Chinese nationals in these events.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/05/us-scientists-boycott-nasa-china-ban|title=US scientists boycott Nasa conference over China ban|last1=Sample|first1=Ian|date=2013-10-05|website=The Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-07-31}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)