Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Forcing (mathematics)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Easton forcing == The exact value of the continuum in the above Cohen model, and variants like <math> \operatorname{Fin}(\omega \times \kappa,2) </math> for cardinals <math> \kappa </math> in general, was worked out by [[Robert M. Solovay]], who also worked out how to violate <math> \mathsf{GCH} </math> (the [[Continuum hypothesis#Generalized continuum hypothesis|generalized continuum hypothesis]]), for [[regular cardinal]]s only, a finite number of times. For example, in the above Cohen model, if <math> \mathsf{CH} </math> holds in <math> V </math>, then <math> 2^{\aleph_{0}} = \aleph_{2} </math> holds in <math> V[G] </math>. [[William Bigelow Easton|William B. Easton]] worked out the proper class version of violating the <math> \mathsf{GCH} </math> for regular cardinals, basically showing that the known restrictions, (monotonicity, [[Cantor's theorem|Cantor's Theorem]] and [[König's theorem (set theory)|König's Theorem]]), were the only <math> \mathsf{ZFC} </math>-provable restrictions (see [[Easton's theorem|Easton's Theorem]]). Easton's work was notable in that it involved forcing with a proper class of conditions. In general, the method of forcing with a proper class of conditions fails to give a model of <math> \mathsf{ZFC} </math>. For example, forcing with <math> \operatorname{Fin}(\omega \times \mathbf{On},2) </math>, where <math> \mathbf{On} </math> is the proper class of all ordinals, makes the continuum a proper class. On the other hand, forcing with <math> \operatorname{Fin}(\omega,\mathbf{On}) </math> introduces a countable enumeration of the ordinals. In both cases, the resulting <math> V[G] </math> is visibly not a model of <math> \mathsf{ZFC} </math>. At one time, it was thought that more sophisticated forcing would also allow an arbitrary variation in the powers of [[Regular cardinal|singular cardinal]]s. However, this has turned out to be a difficult, subtle and even surprising problem, with several more [[PCF theory|restrictions provable]] in <math> \mathsf{ZFC} </math> and with the forcing models depending on the consistency of various [[large cardinal|large-cardinal]] properties. Many open problems remain.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)