Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inductive reasoning
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Ancient philosophy=== For a move from particular to universal, [[Aristotle]] in the 300s BCE used the Greek word ''epagogé'', which [[Cicero]] translated into the Latin word ''inductio''.<ref name="Gattei">Stefano Gattei, ''Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality without Foundations'' (New York: [[Routledge]], 2009), ch. 2 "Science and philosophy", [https://books.google.com/books?id=oPPu1JvMBFoC&pg=PA28#v=twopage pp. 28–30].</ref> ====Aristotle and the Peripatetic School==== Aristotle's ''[[Posterior Analytics]]'' covers the methods of inductive proof in natural philosophy and in the social sciences. The first book of [[s:Organon (Owen)/The Posterior Analytics|Posterior Analytics]] describes the nature and science of demonstration and its elements: including definition, division, intuitive reason of first principles, particular and universal demonstration, affirmative and negative demonstration, the difference between science and opinion, etc. ====Pyrrhonism==== The ancient [[Pyrrhonism|Pyrrhonists]] were the first Western philosophers to point out the [[Problem of induction]]: that induction cannot, according to them, justify the acceptance of universal statements as true.<ref name="Gattei" /> ====Ancient medicine==== The [[Empiric school]] of ancient Greek medicine employed ''[[epilogism]]'' as a method of inference. 'Epilogism' is a theory-free method that looks at history through the accumulation of facts without major generalization and with consideration of the consequences of making causal claims.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Taleb|first=Nassim Nicholas|title=The Black Swan: Second Edition: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility|publisher=Random House Publishing Group|year=2010|isbn=978-0812973815|location=New York|pages=199, 302, 383}}</ref> Epilogism is an inference which moves entirely within the domain of visible and evident things, it tries not to invoke [[unobservable]]s. The [[Dogmatic school]] of ancient Greek medicine employed ''analogismos'' as a method of inference.<ref>[[Galen]] ''On Medical Experience'', 24.</ref> This method used analogy to reason from what was observed to unobservable forces.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)