Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Itanium
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Market share == Compared to its [[Xeon]] family of server processors, Itanium was never a high-volume product for Intel. Intel does not release production numbers, but one industry analyst estimated that the production rate was 200,000 processors per year in 2007.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3705016 | title=Intel Plows Forward With Itanium | access-date=October 18, 2007 | last=Patrizio | first=Andy | date=October 12, 2007 | work=InternetNews.com | archive-date=April 22, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180422062117/http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3705016 | url-status=dead }}</ref> According to [[Gartner Inc.]], the total number of Itanium servers (not processors) sold by all vendors in 2007, was about 55,000 (It is unclear whether clustered servers counted as a single server or not.). This compares with 417,000 RISC servers (spread across all RISC vendors) and 8.4 million x86 servers. [[International Data Corporation|IDC]] reports that a total of 184,000 Itanium-based systems were sold from 2001 through 2007. For the combined POWER/SPARC/Itanium systems market, IDC reports that POWER captured 42% of revenue and SPARC captured 32%, while Itanium-based system revenue reached 26% in the second quarter of 2008.<ref>[[International Data Corporation|IDC]] World Wide Server Tracker, Q2'08</ref> According to an IDC analyst, in 2007, HP accounted for perhaps 80% of Itanium systems revenue.<ref name="CW1"/> According to Gartner, in 2008, HP accounted for 95% of Itanium sales.<ref name="vance late"/> HP's Itanium system sales were at an annual rate of $4.4Bn at the end of 2008, and declined to $3.5Bn by the end of 2009,<ref name="Gartner 2009-q4">{{cite news | url=https://www.theregister.com/2010/02/24/gartner_q4_2009_servers/ | title=Gartner report card gives high marks to x64, blades | access-date=November 25, 2022 | last=Morgan | first=Timothy Prickett | date=February 24, 2010 | work=[[The Register]] }}</ref> compared to a 35% decline in UNIX system revenue for Sun and an 11% drop for IBM, with an x86-64 server revenue increase of 14% during this period. In December 2012, IDC released a research report stating that Itanium server shipments would remain flat through 2016, with annual shipment of 26,000 systems (a decline of over 50% compared to shipments in 2008).<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028587/intel-shifts-gears-on-itanium-raising-questions-about-the-server-chips-future.html| title = Intel shifts gears on Itanium, raising questions about the server chip's future| access-date = 2013-08-04| archive-date = 2013-06-15| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130615180648/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028587/intel-shifts-gears-on-itanium-raising-questions-about-the-server-chips-future.html| url-status = live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)