Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lawrence Lessig
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Artificial intelligence === Lessig came out in favor of a "right to warn" proposed by former [[OpenAI]] employees that would protect their right to warn the public of the [[Existential risk from artificial general intelligence|catastrophic risks of AI]]. Lessig also agreed to work pro bono in defense of the whistleblowers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lessig |first=Lawrence |date=2024-06-06 |title=Opinion: The risks of AI could be catastrophic. We should empower company workers to warn us |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/06/opinions/artificial-intelligence-risks-chat-gpt-lessig/index.html |access-date=2024-08-15 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Samuel |first=Sigal |date=2024-06-05 |title=OpenAI insiders are demanding a "right to warn" the public |url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/353933/openai-open-letter-safety-whistleblowers-right-to-warn |access-date=2024-08-15 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}</ref> In August 2024, Lessig co-authored a letter alongside AI researchers [[Yoshua Bengio]], [[Geoffrey Hinton]], and [[Stuart J. Russell|Stuart Russell]] in favor of [[Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act|SB 1047]], a California AI safety bill that would require companies training the most powerful models to perform risk assessments on their models before release. The letter argued that the bill would be a first step towards mitigating the severe risks posed by AI, and "the bare minimum for effective regulation of this technology". Lessig said that [[Gavin Newsom]], the Governor of California, would have the opportunity to "cement California as a national first-mover in regulating AI."<ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Pillay |first1=Tharin |last2=Booth |first2=Harry |date=2024-08-07 |title=Exclusive: Renowned Experts Pen Support for California's Landmark AI Safety Bill |url=https://time.com/7008947/california-ai-bill-letter/ |access-date=2024-08-15 |magazine=TIME |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=California's AI bill is sparking fierce debate in Silicon Valley |url=https://www.thedrum.com/news/2024/08/14/california-s-ai-bill-headed-sparking-fierce-debate-silicon-valley |access-date=2024-08-15 |website=The Drum}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)