Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lorentz transformation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====The Lie group SO{{sup|+}}(3,1)==== The set of transformations <math display="block"> \{ B(\boldsymbol{\zeta}), R(\boldsymbol{\theta}), \Lambda(\boldsymbol{\zeta}, \boldsymbol{\theta}) \} </math> with matrix multiplication as the operation of composition forms a group, called the "restricted Lorentz group", and is the [[special indefinite orthogonal group]] SO{{sup|+}}(3,1). (The plus sign indicates that it preserves the orientation of the temporal dimension). For simplicity, look at the infinitesimal Lorentz boost in the {{mvar|x}} direction (examining a boost in any other direction, or rotation about any axis, follows an identical procedure). The infinitesimal boost is a small boost away from the identity, obtained by the [[Taylor expansion]] of the boost matrix to first order about {{math|1=''ζ'' = 0}}, <math display="block"> B_x = I + \zeta \left. \frac{\partial B_x}{\partial \zeta } \right|_{\zeta=0} + \cdots </math> where the higher order terms not shown are negligible because {{mvar|ζ}} is small, and {{math|''B''{{sub|''x''}}}} is simply the boost matrix in the ''x'' direction. The [[matrix calculus|derivative of the matrix]] is the matrix of derivatives (of the entries, with respect to the same variable), and it is understood the derivatives are found first then evaluated at {{math|1=''ζ'' = 0}}, <math display="block"> \left. \frac{\partial B_x }{\partial \zeta } \right|_{\zeta=0} = - K_x \,. </math> For now, {{math|''K''{{sub|''x''}}}} is defined by this result (its significance will be explained shortly). In the limit of an infinite number of infinitely small steps, the finite boost transformation in the form of a [[matrix exponential]] is obtained <math display="block"> B_x =\lim_{N\to\infty}\left(I-\frac{\zeta }{N}K_x\right)^{N} = e^{-\zeta K_x} </math> where the [[Exponential function#Formal definition|limit definition of the exponential]] has been used (see also [[characterizations of the exponential function]]). More generally<ref group="nb">Explicitly, <math display="block"> \boldsymbol{\zeta} \cdot\mathbf{K} = \zeta_x K_x + \zeta_y K_y + \zeta_z K_z </math> <math display="block"> \boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot\mathbf{J} = \theta_x J_x + \theta_y J_y + \theta_z J_z </math> </ref> <math display="block">B(\boldsymbol{\zeta}) = e^{-\boldsymbol{\zeta}\cdot\mathbf{K}} \, , \quad R(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = e^{\boldsymbol{\theta}\cdot\mathbf{J}} \,. </math> The axis-angle vector {{math|'''θ'''}} and rapidity vector {{math|'''ζ'''}} are altogether six continuous variables which make up the group parameters (in this particular representation), and the generators of the group are {{math|1='''K''' = (''K''{{sub|''x''}}, ''K''{{sub|''y''}}, ''K''{{sub|''z''}})}} and {{math|1='''J''' = (''J''{{sub|''x''}}, ''J''{{sub|''y''}}, ''J''{{sub|''z''}})}}, each vectors of matrices with the explicit forms<ref group=nb>In [[quantum mechanics]], [[relativistic quantum mechanics]], and [[quantum field theory]], a different convention is used for these matrices; the right hand sides are all multiplied by a factor of the imaginary unit {{math|''i'' {{=}} {{sqrt|−1}}}}.</ref> <math display="block">\begin{alignat}{3} K_x &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}\,,\quad & K_y &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\,,\quad & K_z &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \\[10mu] J_x &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}\,,\quad & J_y &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\,,\quad & J_z &= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \end{alignat}</math> These are all defined in an analogous way to {{math|''K''{{sub|''x''}}}} above, although the minus signs in the boost generators are conventional. Physically, the generators of the Lorentz group correspond to important symmetries in spacetime: {{math|'''J'''}} are the ''rotation generators'' which correspond to [[angular momentum]], and {{math|'''K'''}} are the ''boost generators'' which correspond to the motion of the system in spacetime. The derivative of any smooth curve {{math|''C''(''t'')}} with {{math|1=''C''(0) = ''I''}} in the group depending on some group parameter {{mvar|t}} with respect to that group parameter, evaluated at {{math|1=''t'' = 0}}, serves as a definition of a corresponding group generator {{mvar|G}}, and this reflects an infinitesimal transformation away from the identity. The smooth curve can always be taken as an exponential as the exponential will always map {{mvar|G}} smoothly back into the group via {{math|''t'' → exp(''tG'')}} for all {{mvar|t}}; this curve will yield {{mvar|G}} again when differentiated at {{math|1=''t'' = 0}}. Expanding the exponentials in their Taylor series obtains <math display="block"> B({\boldsymbol {\zeta }})=I-\sinh \zeta (\mathbf {n} \cdot \mathbf {K} )+(\cosh \zeta -1)(\mathbf {n} \cdot \mathbf {K} )^2</math> <math display="block">R(\boldsymbol {\theta })=I+\sin \theta (\mathbf {e} \cdot \mathbf {J} )+(1-\cos \theta )(\mathbf {e} \cdot \mathbf {J} )^2\,.</math> which compactly reproduce the boost and rotation matrices as given in the previous section. It has been stated that the general proper Lorentz transformation is a product of a boost and rotation. At the ''infinitesimal'' level the product <math display="block"> \begin{align} \Lambda &= (I - \boldsymbol {\zeta } \cdot \mathbf {K} + \cdots )(I + \boldsymbol {\theta } \cdot \mathbf {J} + \cdots ) \\ &= (I + \boldsymbol {\theta } \cdot \mathbf {J} + \cdots )(I - \boldsymbol {\zeta } \cdot \mathbf {K} + \cdots ) \\ &= I - \boldsymbol {\zeta } \cdot \mathbf {K} + \boldsymbol {\theta } \cdot \mathbf {J} + \cdots \end{align} </math> is commutative because only linear terms are required (products like {{math|('''θ'''·'''J''')('''ζ'''·'''K''')}} and {{math|('''ζ'''·'''K''')('''θ'''·'''J''')}} count as higher order terms and are negligible). Taking the limit as before leads to the finite transformation in the form of an exponential <math display="block">\Lambda (\boldsymbol{\zeta}, \boldsymbol{\theta}) = e^{-\boldsymbol{\zeta} \cdot\mathbf{K} + \boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot\mathbf{J} }.</math> The converse is also true, but the decomposition of a finite general Lorentz transformation into such factors is nontrivial. In particular, <math display="block">e^{-\boldsymbol{\zeta} \cdot\mathbf{K} + \boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot\mathbf{J} } \ne e^{-\boldsymbol{\zeta} \cdot\mathbf{K}} e^{\boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot\mathbf{J}},</math> because the generators do not commute. For a description of how to find the factors of a general Lorentz transformation in terms of a boost and a rotation ''in principle'' (this usually does not yield an intelligible expression in terms of generators {{math|'''J'''}} and {{math|'''K'''}}), see [[Wigner rotation]]. If, on the other hand, ''the decomposition is given'' in terms of the generators, and one wants to find the product in terms of the generators, then the [[Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula]] applies.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)