Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Quadratic reciprocity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Proofs of the supplements=== The value of the Legendre symbol of <math>-1</math> (used in the proof above) follows directly from [[Euler's criterion]]: :<math> \left(\frac{-1}{p}\right)\equiv (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \bmod p</math> by Euler's criterion, but both sides of this congruence are numbers of the form <math>\pm 1</math>, so they must be equal. Whether <math>2</math> is a quadratic residue can be concluded if we know the number of solutions of the equation <math>x^2+y^2=2</math> with <math>x, y \in \Z_p,</math> which can be solved by standard methods. Namely, all its solutions where <math>xy\neq 0, x\neq\pm y</math> can be grouped into octuplets of the form <math>(\pm x, \pm y), (\pm y, \pm x)</math>, and what is left are four solutions of the form <math>(\pm 1, \pm 1)</math> and possibly four additional solutions where <math>x^2=2, y=0</math> and <math>x=0, y^2=2</math>, which exist precisely if <math>2</math> is a quadratic residue. That is, <math>2</math> is a quadratic residue precisely if the number of solutions of this equation is divisible by <math>8</math>. And this equation can be solved in just the same way here as over the rational numbers: substitute <math>x=a+1, y=at+1</math>, where we demand that <math>a\neq 0</math> (leaving out the two solutions <math>(1,\pm 1)</math>), then the original equation transforms into :<math>a=-\frac{2(t+1)}{(t^2+1)}.</math> Here <math>t</math> can have any value that does not make the denominator zero β for which there are <math>1+\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right)</math> possibilities (i.e. <math>2</math> if <math>-1</math> is a residue, <math>0</math> if not) β and also does not make <math>a</math> zero, which excludes one more option, <math>t=-1</math>. Thus there are :<math>p-\left(1+\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right)\right)-1</math> possibilities for <math>t</math>, and so together with the two excluded solutions there are overall <math>p-\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right)</math> solutions of the original equation. Therefore, <math>2</math> is a residue modulo <math>p</math> if and only if <math>8</math> divides <math>p-(-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}}</math>. This is a reformulation of the condition stated above.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)