Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Resource curse
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Gender inequality === Studies suggest countries with abundant natural resources have higher levels of [[gender inequality]] in the areas of wages, labor force participation, violence, and education. Research links gender inequality in the Middle East to resource wealth.<ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last=Ross|first=Michael L.|date=2008-02-01|title=Oil, Islam, and Women|journal=American Political Science Review|volume=102|issue=1|pages=107β123|doi=10.1017/S0003055408080040|issn=1537-5943|s2cid=54825180}}</ref> According to Michael Ross:<blockquote>Oil production affects gender relations by reducing the presence of women in the labor force. The failure of women to join the nonagricultural labor force has profound social consequences: it leads to higher fertility rates, less education for girls, and less female influence within the family. It also has far-reaching political consequences: when fewer women work outside the home, they are less likely to exchange information and overcome collective action problems; less likely to mobilize politically, and to lobby for expanded rights; and less likely to gain representation in government. That leaves oil-producing states with atypically strong patriarchal cultures and political institutions.<ref name=":12" /></blockquote> Ross argues that in oil-rich countries, across the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia, the need for female labor reduces as export-oriented and female-dominated manufacturing is ousted by Dutch disease effects.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Ross|first=Michael L.|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400841929|title=The Oil Curse|date=2012-03-04|publisher=Princeton University Press|doi=10.1515/9781400841929|isbn=978-1-4008-4192-9}}</ref> This hypothesis has received further support by the analysis of mining booms in Africa.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kotsadam|first1=Andreas|last2=Tolonen|first2=Anja|date=July 2016|title=African Mining, Gender, and Local Employment|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X1600005X|journal=World Development|volume=83|pages=325β339|doi=10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.007|s2cid=153471048}}</ref> For the United States, the evidence is mixed. State-level comparisons suggest that resource wealth leads to lower levels of female labor force participation, lower turnout and fewer seats held by women in legislatures.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Simmons|first=Joel W.|date=January 2016|title=Resource Wealth and Women's Economic and Political Power in the U.S. States|journal=Comparative Political Studies|volume=49|pages=115β152|doi=10.1177/0010414015597510|number=1|s2cid=155279746}}</ref> On the other hand, a county-level analysis of resource booms in the early 20th century found an overall positive effect of resource wealth on single women's labor force participation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Maurer|first1=Stephan|last2=Potlogea|first2=Andrei|date=January 2021|title=Male-biased Demand Shocks and Women's Labour Force Participation: Evidence from Large Oil Field Discoveries|journal=Economica|volume=88|issue=349|pages=167β188|doi=10.1111/ecca.12341|s2cid=158697381|doi-access=free}}</ref> Research has also linked resource wealth to greater domestic violence,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Krauser|first1=Mario|last2=Wegenast|first2=Tim|last3=Schneider|first3=Gerald|last4=Hess Elgersma|first4=Ingeborg|date=October 2019|title=A gendered resource curse? Mineral ownership, female unemployment and domestic violence in Sub-Saharan Africa|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42597-019-00019-8|journal=Zeitschrift fΓΌr Friedens- und Konfliktforschung|language=en|volume=8|issue=2|pages=213β237|doi=10.1007/s42597-019-00019-8|s2cid=211451656|issn=2192-1741}}</ref> and a gender gap in education.<ref>{{Cite book|author=Gylfason, Thorvaldur|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1065189720|title=Inequality and economic growth : do natural resources matter?|date=2002|publisher=Birkbeck College, Dept. of Economics|oclc=1065189720}}</ref><ref>Papyrakis Elissaios, Richard Palmer-Jones, Nitya Rao, Bola Akanji, Godwin Akpokodje, and Bayo Ajala (2009). "Gender and Growth Assessment: Macroeconomic study. Research Report." Report produced for the Department for International Development (DFID) and Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)