Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Being and Nothingness
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== ''Being and Nothingness'' is considered Sartre's most important philosophical work,<ref name="Baldwin" /> and the most important non-fiction expression of his [[existentialism]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Roth, John K. |editor=McGreal, Ian P. |title=Great Thinkers of the Western World |publisher=HarperCollins |location=New York |year=1992 |page=[https://archive.org/details/greatthinkersofw00ianp/page/542 542] |isbn=0-06-270026-X |url=https://archive.org/details/greatthinkersofw00ianp/page/542 }}</ref> Christian existentialist [[Gabriel Marcel]] wrote that it was of "incontestable" importance and ranked among the most important contributions made to general philosophy. While Marcel noted the influence of Heidegger on "the form at least" of ''Being and Nothingness'', he also observed that Sartre diverged from the views expressed by Heidegger in ''Being and Time'' (1927) in important ways, and that Sartre's contributions were original. Marcel considered Sartre's analysis of bad faith "one of the most outstanding and solid" parts of ''Being and Nothingness'', writing that it prevented Sartre's arguments from being purely abstract. Marcel saw one of the most important merits of the work to be to show "that a form of metaphysics which denies or refuses grace inevitably ends by setting up in front of us the image of an atrophied and contradictory world where the better part of ourselves is finally unable to recognise itself".<ref>{{cite book|last=Marcel|first=Gabriel|title=''Homo Viator: Introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope''|url=https://archive.org/details/homoviatorintrod0000marc|url-access=registration|publisher=[[Victor Gollancz Ltd]]|year=1951|pages=[https://archive.org/details/homoviatorintrod0000marc/page/166 166]β167, 183}}</ref> The philosopher [[Jean Wahl]] criticized Sartre's arguments about the topic of "nothing".<ref>{{cite book |author=Grene, Marjorie |title=Introduction to Existentialism |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontoex00marj |url-access=registration |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1959 |page=[https://archive.org/details/introductiontoex00marj/page/52 52] }}</ref> The philosopher [[Frederick Copleston]] described Sartre's view that all human actions are the result of free choice as "highly implausible", though he noted that Sartre had ways of defending his position.<ref>{{cite book |author=Copleston, Frederick |title=A History of Philosophy Volume IX. Modern Philosophy from the French Revolution to Sartre, Camus, and Levi-Strauss |publisher=Doubleday |location=New York |year=1994 |pages=355β6 |isbn=0-385-47046-0 }}</ref> He also expressed sympathy for Marcel's criticism of Sartre, and described Sartre's view of freedom as both "nihilistic" and possibly inconsistent with some of Sartre's other views.<ref>{{cite book |author=Copleston, Frederick |title=A History of Philosophy Volume 11. Logical positivism and existentialism |publisher=Continuum |location=New York |year=2013 |pages=116 |isbn= 978-0-8264-6905-2 }}</ref> The philosopher [[A. J. Ayer]] wrote that, apart from some psychological insights, the book was "a pretentious metaphysical thesis" and "principally an exercise in misusing the verb 'to be'".<ref>{{cite book|pages=174β175|title=Paris After the Liberation: 1944 - 1949|last2=Cooper|first2=Artemis|isbn=9780141032412|last1=Beevor|first1=Antony|publisher=Penguin|year=2007}}</ref> The author [[Susan Sontag]] praised Sartre's discussions of the body and concrete relations with others. She identified them as part of a French tradition of serious thought about problems of fundamental importance.<ref>{{cite book |author=Sontag, Susan |title=Against Interpretation and Other Essays |publisher=Anchor Books |location=New York |year=1990 |pages=ix, 256β257 |isbn=0-385-26708-8 }}</ref> The literary scholar John B. Vickery wrote that ''Being and Nothingness'' resembles Sir [[James George Frazer]]'s ''[[The Golden Bough]]'' (1890) in the way its author "merges psychology and the concrete sense of fiction", although he considered it less readable than Frazer's work.<ref>{{cite book |author=Vickery, John B. |editor=Slote, Bernice |title=Myth and Symbol: Critical Approaches and Applications |publisher=University of Nebraska Press |location=Lincoln |year=1967 |page=175 }}</ref> The philosopher [[Iris Murdoch]] compared ''Being and Nothingness'' to [[Gilbert Ryle]]'s ''[[The Concept of Mind]]'' (1949). She maintained that [[continental philosophy]] shares the same general orientation as English [[analytic philosophy]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Murdoch|first=Iris|title=''Sartre: Romantic Rationalist''|publisher=[[Fontana Books]]|year=1968|pages=8β9}}</ref> According to the philosopher [[Steven Crowell]], ''Being and Nothingness'' had come to be seen as outdated by Sartre's death in 1980, since its emphasis on consciousness associated with "the subjectivism and psychologism that structuralism and analytic philosophy had finally laid to rest".<ref name = Cromwell>{{cite book |author=Crowell, Steven |editor=Crowell, Steven |title=The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=2012 |page=199 |isbn=978-0-521-73278-9 }}</ref> The philosopher [[David Pears]] criticized Sartre's critique of Freud, describing it as complex but imprecisely formulated and open to potential objections.<ref>{{cite book |author=Pears, David |editor1=Wollheim, Richard |editor2=Hopkins, James |title=Philosophical Essays on Freud |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=1982 |pages=273β276 |isbn=978-0521284257 }}</ref> The philosopher [[Thomas Baldwin (philosopher)|Thomas Baldwin]] described ''Being and Nothingness'' as a work of pessimism. He wrote that Sartre's argument that Freud's theory of repression is internally flawed is based on a misunderstanding of Freud, and that Sartre's attempts to adapt Freud's ideas are of greater interest.<ref name="Baldwin">{{cite book |author=Baldwin, Thomas |editor=Honderich, Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=2005 |pages=835β7 |isbn=0-19-926479-1 }}</ref> The director [[Richard Eyre]] recalled that ''Being and Nothingness'' was popular among British students in the 1960s, but suggests that among them the work usually went unread.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Eyre, Richard |author2=Sartre, Jean-Paul |title=Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology |publisher=Routledge |location=London |year=2003 |page=viii |isbn=0-415-27848-1 }}</ref> Several authors, including the sociologist Murray S, Davis,<ref name="Davis" /> the philosophers [[Roger Scruton]] and Maxine Sheets-Johnstone,<ref name="Scruton" /><ref name="Sheets-Johnstone" /> and the physician Frank Gonzalez-Crussi,<ref name="Gonzalez-Crussi" /> have praised Sartre for his contributions to the philosophy of sex. Davis credited Sartre with being the first author to present a phenomenological analysis of sex.<ref name="Davis">{{cite book |author=Davis, Murray S. |title=Smut: Erotic Reality/Obscene Ideology |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1985 |page=2 |isbn=0-226-13792-9 }}</ref> Scruton credited Sartre with providing "perhaps the most acute philosophical analysis" of sexual desire and correctly arguing that treating sexual desire as equivalent to appetite ignores "the interpersonal component of human sexual responses." He described Sartre's reflections on ''le visqueux'' as "celebrated".<ref name="Scruton">{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |author-link=Roger Scruton |title=Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation |publisher=Phoenix |location=London |year=1994 |pages=23, 32, 74 |isbn=1-85799-100-1 }}</ref> He has also credited Sartre with providing a "stunning apology for sado-masochism",<ref>{{cite book |author1=Scruton, Roger |author2=Dooley, Mark |title=Conversations with Roger Scruton |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=London |year=2016 |page=103 |isbn=978-1-4729-1709-6 }}</ref> and characterized ''Being and Nothingness'' as a "great work of post-Christian theology".<ref>{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |title=The Soul of the World |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton and Oxford |year=2014 |page=188 |isbn=978-0-691-16157-0 }}</ref> Gonzalez-Crussi credited Sartre with recognizing that it is incorrect to equate sexual desire with desire for sexual acts.<ref name="Gonzalez-Crussi">{{cite book |author1=Gonzalez-Crussi, Frank |title=On the Nature of Things Erotic |publisher=Vintage Books |location=New York |year=1989 |page=[https://archive.org/details/onnatureofthings00gonz/page/13 13] |isbn=0-679-72199-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/onnatureofthings00gonz/page/13 }}</ref> Sheets-Johnstone believed Sartre presented a subtle analysis of human sexuality. She praised his understanding of desire in general and suggested that his views about the subject anticipated those of the philosopher [[Michel Foucault]]. She believed that his views contained both significant truth and internal contradictions. She suggested that despite his criticism of Freud, his views about women and female sexuality were in some ways similar to Freud's.<ref name="Sheets-Johnstone">{{cite book |author=Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine |title=The Roots of Power: Animate Form and Gendered Bodies |publisher=Open Court |location=Chicago |year=1994 |pages=25, 29-30, 181-182, 185-186 |isbn=0-8126-9258-6 }}</ref> Naomi Greene, arguing that there is a "distaste for sexuality" in Sartre's work, identifies a clear "anti-sexual bias" present in ''Being and Nothingness''.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Greene |first1=Naomi |title=Sartre, Sexuality, and The Second Sex |journal=Philosophy and Literature |date=Fall 1980 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=199β211|doi=10.1353/phl.1980.0008 |s2cid=144515435 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)