Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Interpreter (computing)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Self-interpreter=== {{main|Meta-circular evaluator}} A self-interpreter is a [[programming language]] interpreter written in a programming language which can interpret itself; an example is a [[BASIC programming language|BASIC]] interpreter written in BASIC. Self-interpreters are related to [[Self-hosting (compilers)|self-hosting compiler]]s. If no [[compiler]] exists for the language to be interpreted, creating a self-interpreter requires the implementation of the language in a host language (which may be another programming language or [[Assembler (computing)|assembler]]). By having a first interpreter such as this, the system is [[Bootstrapping (compilers)|bootstrapped]] and new versions of the interpreter can be developed in the language itself. It was in this way that [[Donald Knuth]] developed the TANGLE interpreter for the language [[WEB]] of the de-facto standard [[TeX]] [[typesetting|typesetting system]]. Defining a computer language is usually done in relation to an abstract machine (so-called [[operational semantics]]) or as a mathematical function ([[denotational semantics]]). A language may also be defined by an interpreter in which the semantics of the host language is given. The definition of a language by a self-interpreter is not well-founded (it cannot define a language), but a self-interpreter tells a reader about the expressiveness and elegance of a language. It also enables the interpreter to interpret its source code, the first step towards reflective interpreting. An important design dimension in the implementation of a self-interpreter is whether a feature of the interpreted language is implemented with the same feature in the interpreter's host language. An example is whether a [[closure (computer science)|closure]] in a [[Lisp programming language|Lisp]]-like language is implemented using closures in the interpreter language or implemented "manually" with a data structure explicitly storing the environment. The more features implemented by the same feature in the host language, the less control the programmer of the interpreter has; for example, a different behavior for dealing with number overflows cannot be realized if the arithmetic operations are delegated to corresponding operations in the host language. Some languages such as [[Lisp programming language|Lisp]] and [[Prolog]] have elegant self-interpreters.<ref>Bondorf, Anders. "[https://web.archive.org/web/20181112101324/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a089/c5ae66c3311b45de0aaddfa457e4eb821316.pdf Logimix: A self-applicable partial evaluator for Prolog]." Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation. Springer, London, 1993. 214-227.</ref> Much research on self-interpreters (particularly reflective interpreters) has been conducted in the [[Scheme (programming language)|Scheme programming language]], a dialect of Lisp. In general, however, any [[Turing completeness|Turing-complete]] language allows writing of its own interpreter. Lisp is such a language, because Lisp programs are lists of symbols and other lists. XSLT is such a language, because XSLT programs are written in XML. A sub-domain of [[metaprogramming]] is the writing of [[domain-specific language]]s (DSLs). Clive Gifford introduced<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gifford |first1=Clive |title=Eigenratios of Self-Interpreters |url=http://eigenratios.blogspot.com/2006/11/wanted-eigenratios-of-brainfck-self.html |website=Blogger |access-date=10 November 2019}}</ref> a measure quality of self-interpreter (the eigenratio), the limit of the ratio between computer time spent running a stack of ''N'' self-interpreters and time spent to run a stack of {{nowrap|''N'' β 1}} self-interpreters as ''N'' goes to infinity. This value does not depend on the program being run. The book ''[[Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs]]'' presents examples of [[meta-circular evaluator|meta-circular interpretation]] for Scheme and its dialects. Other examples of languages with a self-interpreter are [[Forth (programming language)|Forth]] and [[Pascal (programming language)|Pascal]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)