Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Level of measurement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Other proposed typologies=== Typologies aside from Stevens's typology have been proposed. For instance, [[Frederick Mosteller|Mosteller]] and [[John Tukey|Tukey]] (1977) and Nelder (1990)<ref>Nelder, J. A. (1990). The knowledge needed to computerise the analysis and interpretation of statistical information. In ''Expert systems and artificial intelligence: the need for information about data''. Library Association Report, London, March, 23–27.</ref> described continuous counts, continuous ratios, count ratios, and categorical modes of data. See also Chrisman (1998), van den Berg (1991).<ref>van den Berg, G. (1991). ''Choosing an analysis method''. Leiden: DSWO Press</ref> ==== Mosteller and Tukey's typology (1977) ==== Mosteller and Tukey<ref name="Mosteller"/> noted that the four levels are not exhaustive and proposed seven instead: # Names # Grades (ordered labels like beginner, intermediate, advanced) # Ranks (orders with 1 being the smallest or largest, 2 the next smallest or largest, and so on) # Counted fractions (bound by 0 and 1) # Counts (non-negative integers) # Amounts (non-negative real numbers) # Balances (any real number) For example, percentages (a variation on fractions in the Mosteller–Tukey framework) do not fit well into Stevens's framework: No transformation is fully admissible.<ref name = "Velleman and Wilkinson 1993" /> ==== Chrisman's typology (1998) ==== Nicholas R. Chrisman<ref name="Chrisman"/> introduced an expanded list of levels of measurement to account for various measurements that do not necessarily fit with the traditional notions of levels of measurement. Measurements bound to a range and repeating (like degrees in a circle, clock time, etc.), graded membership categories, and other types of measurement do not fit to Stevens's original work, leading to the introduction of six new levels of measurement, for a total of ten: # Nominal # Gradation of membership # Ordinal # Interval # Log-interval # Extensive ratio # Cyclical ratio # Derived ratio # Counts # Absolute While some claim that the extended levels of measurement are rarely used outside of academic geography,<ref name = "Wolman 2006">{{cite journal |title=Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science |journal=Conservation Biology |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=1626–1634 |year=2006 |last=Wolman |first=Abel G |s2cid=21372776 |doi=10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00531.x|pmid=17181798 |bibcode=2006ConBi..20.1626W }}</ref> graded membership is central to [[fuzzy set theory]], while absolute measurements include probabilities and the plausibility and ignorance in [[Dempster–Shafer theory]]. Cyclical ratio measurements include angles and times. Counts appear to be ratio measurements, but the scale is not arbitrary and fractional counts are commonly meaningless. Log-interval measurements are commonly displayed in stock market graphics. All these types of measurements are commonly used outside academic geography, and do not fit well to Stevens's original work.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)