Editing Picard language (section)

== Further reading ==
; Linguistic studies of Picard
*Villeneuve, Anne-José. 2013. (with Julie Auger) {{"'}}Chtileu qu’i m’freumereu m’bouque i n’est point coér au monne': Grammatical variation and diglossia in Picardie". ''Journal of French Language Studies'' 23,1:109-133.
*Auger, Julie. 2010. "Picard et français; La grammaire de la différence". Mario Barra-Jover (ed.), ''Langue française'' 168,4:19-34.
*Auger, Julie. 2008. (with Anne-José Villeneuve). ''Ne'' deletion in Picard and in regional French: Evidence for distinct grammars. Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy (eds.), ''Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities''. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp.&nbsp;223–247.
*Auger, Julie. 2005. (with Brian José). “Geminates and Picard pronominal clitic allomorphy”. ''Catalan Journal of Linguistics'' 4:127-154.
*Auger, Julie. 2004. (with Brian José). “[https://www.indiana.edu/~iulcwp/pdfs/04-jose.pdf (Final) nasalization as an alternative to (final) devoicing: The case of Vimeu Picard]”. In Brian José and Kenneth de Jong (eds.). ''Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers Online'' 4.
*Auger, Julie. 2003. “Le redoublement des sujets en picard”. ''Journal of French Language Studies'' 13,3:381-404.
*Auger, Julie. 2003. “Les pronoms clitiques sujets en picard: une analyse au confluent de la phonologie, de la morphologie et de la syntaxe”. ''Journal of French Language Studies'' 13,1:1-22.
*Auger, Julie. 2003. “The development of a literary standard: The case of Picard in Vimeu-Ponthieu, France”. In Brian D. Joseph et al. (eds.), ''When Languages Collide: Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition, and Language Coexistence'', . Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press. pp.&nbsp;141–164.5
*Auger, Julie. 2003. “Pronominal clitics in Picard revisited”. In Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luís López, & Richard Cameron (eds.), ''Language Knowledge and Language Use: Selected Papers from LSRL 31''. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp.&nbsp;3–20.
*Auger, Julie. 2003. “Picard parlé, picard écrit: comment s’influencent-ils l’un l’autre?”. In Jacques Landrecies & André Petit (eds.), "Le picard d’hier et d’aujourd’hui", special issue of ''Bien dire et bien Aprandre'', 21, Centre d'Études médiévales et Dialectales, Lille 3, pp.&nbsp;17–32.
*Auger, Julie. 2002. (with Jeffrey Steele) “A constraint-based analysis of intraspeaker variation: Vocalic epenthesis in Vimeu Picard”. In Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora, & Diana Cresti (eds.), ''Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from the XXIXth Linguistic Symposium on the Romance Languages (LSRL), Ann Arbor 8–11 April 1999''. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp.&nbsp;306–324.
*Auger, Julie. 2002. “Picard parlé, picard écrit: dans quelle mesure l’écrit représente-t-il l’oral?”. In Claus Pusch & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), ''Romanistische Korpuslinguistik. Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance Corpus Linguistics. Corpora and Spoken Language''. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. pp.&nbsp;267–280. (ScriptOralia Series)
*Auger, Julie. 2001. “Phonological variation and Optimality Theory: Evidence from word-initial vowel epenthesis in Picard”. ''Language Variation and Change'' 13,3:253-303.
*Auger, Julie. 2000. “Phonology, variation, and prosodic structure: Word-final epenthesis in Vimeu Picard”. In Josep M. Fontana et al. (eds.), ''Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE)''. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. pp.&nbsp;14–24.