Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reproducibility
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Further reading== * {{cite web|title = Scientists on Science: Reproducibility|date = October 2006|url = https://arstechnica.com/science/2006/10/5744/|author = Timmer, John|work = [[Ars Technica]]}} * {{cite web|title = Is redoing scientific research the best way to find truth? During replication attempts, too many studies fail to pass muster |date = January 2015 |url = https://www.sciencenews.org/article/redoing-scientific-research-best-way-find-truth |author = Saey, Tina Hesman |work = [[Science News]]}} "Science is not irrevocably broken, [epidemiologist John Ioannidis] asserts. It just needs some improvements. "Despite the fact that I've published papers with pretty depressive titles, I'm actually an optimist," Ioannidis says. "I find no other investment of a society that is better placed than science.""
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)