Editing Schulze method (section)

=== Government ===
The Schulze method is used by the city of [[Silla, Valencia|Silla, Spain]] for all referendums.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hortanoticias |first=Redacción |date=2016-02-23 |title=Al voltant de 2.000 participants en dos dies en la primera enquesta popular de Silla que decidirà sobre espectacles taurins |url=https://www.hortanoticias.com/al-voltant-de-2-000-participants-en-dos-dies-en-la-primera-enquesta-popular-de-silla-que-decidira-sobre-espectacles-taurins/ |access-date=2022-09-24 |website=Hortanoticias.com |language=es |quote=S'utilitzarà el sistema de recompte Schulze perquè és un sistema de vot preferencial que compleix amb el criteri de Condorcet, la qual cosa permet identificar l’opció que, comparada amb qualsevol de les altres, és preferida per la majoria absoluta dels votants |trans-quote=The Schulze counting system will be used because it is a preferential voting system that complies with the Condorcet criterion, which makes it possible to identify the option that, compared to any other option, is preferred by the absolute majority of voters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-02-23 |title=22-26 de febrer: La primera Enquesta Popular de la història de Silla - Notícies - Ajuntament de Silla |url=http://www.silla.es/noticies/i/82830/1342/22-26-de-febrer-la-primera-enquesta-popular-de-la-historia-de-silla |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160223122017/http://www.silla.es/noticies/i/82830/1342/22-26-de-febrer-la-primera-enquesta-popular-de-la-historia-de-silla |archive-date=2016-02-23 |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=Silla Town Council |language=Catalan |quote=S'utilitzarà el sistema de recompte Schulze perquè és un sistema de vot preferencial que compleix amb el criteri de Condorcet, la qual cosa permet identificar l’opció que, comparada amb qualsevol de les altres, és preferida per la majoria absoluta dels votants. |trans-quote=The Schulze counting system will be used because it is a preferential voting system that complies with the Condorcet criterion, which makes it possible to identify the option that, compared to any of the others, is preferred by the absolute majority of voters.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-03-22 |title=UN AÑO DE PROFUNDIZACIÓN DEMOCRÁTICA EN SILLA {{!}} Silla en Democracia |url=http://www.sillaendemocracia.es/un-ano-profundizacion-democratica-silla/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322161112/http://www.sillaendemocracia.es/un-ano-profundizacion-democratica-silla/ |archive-date=2017-03-22 |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=Silla in Democracy |language=Spanish |quote=Ha sido un rotundo éxito organizativo que repetiremos y que se gestó desde meses antes, desarrollando un know-how propio y siendo pioneros en la aplicación del sistema de recuento Condorcet-Schulze para las preguntas con respuesta de ordenación preferencial. Logramos un récord impresionante de participación que pulverizó todas las marcas existentes en procesos similares en municipios españoles (la media usual ronda el 10% de participación mientras que en Silla alcanzamos el 27%). |trans-quote=It has been a resounding organizational success that we will repeat, developed over months with our own know-how, and pioneering the application of the Condorcet-Schulze counting system for questions with preferential ranking responses. We achieved an impressive participation record that shattered all existing benchmarks in similar processes in Spanish municipalities (the usual average is around 10% participation, while in Silla, we reached 27%).}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Silla |first=~ El Cresol de |date=2016-05-26 |title=Un any d'aprofundiment democràtic a Silla |url=https://elcresoldesilla.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/un-any-daprofundiment-democratic-a-silla/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708140022/https://elcresoldesilla.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/un-any-daprofundiment-democratic-a-silla/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=2022-07-08 |access-date=2022-09-24 |website=El Cresol de Silla |language=ca}}</ref> It is also used by the cities of [[Turin]] and [[San Donà di Piave]] in Italy and by the [[London Borough of Southwark]] through their use of the WeGovNow platform, which in turn uses the [[LiquidFeedback]] decision tool.<ref>{{Cite web |title=LiquidFeedback in London, Turin and San Donà di Piave {{!}} Interaktive Demokratie |url=https://interaktive-demokratie.org/news/2016/20160701-LiquidFeedback-in-London-Turin-and-San-Dona-di-Piave.en.html |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=interaktive-demokratie.org |quote=WeGovNow! … is an OpenStreetMap based E-Government solution to be validated and evaluated in London Southwark (UK), Turin (Italy) and San Donà di Piave (Metropolitan City of Venice, Italy)}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Algorithms for Good (The Liquid Democracy Journal, Issue 7) |url=https://liquid-democracy-journal.org/issue/7/The_Liquid_Democracy_Journal-Issue007-02-Algorithms_for_Good.html |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=liquid-democracy-journal.org |language=en |quote=To determine the winner from a set of alternatives, LiquidFeedback implements Clone-Proof Schwartz Sequential Dropping, known as the Schulze Method.}}</ref>